1958•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Trust v. Arden Farms Co. [DISSENT]

Jesse W. Carter

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was not applicable where defendant relinquished all control of the instrumentality that caused the injury and the plaintiff failed to show that its condition did not change since defendant relinquished control.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was not applicable where defendant relinquished all control of the instrumentality that caused the injury and the plaintiff failed to show that its condition did not change since defendant relinquished control.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur was not applicable where defendant relinquished all control of the instrumentality that caused the injury and the plaintiff failed to show that its condition did not change since defendant relinquished control.

Key concepts: Dissent, Political science, Computer security, Business, Law and economics, Law, Computer science, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Trust v. Arden Farms Co. [DISSENT] — Research Paper | ScholarLens