2010•Journal of Nuclear MedicineRequires access

Evaluation of the influence of kidney depth in GFR with radionuclide renal scintigraphy

Xu Chu Zhang, Rong Fu Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

1678 Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of kidney depth in calculating GFR with radionuclide renal scintigraphy. Methods The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of kidney depth in calculating GFR with radionuclide renal scintigraphy. Methods 482 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were enrolled. GFR were estimated simultaneously using modified Gate’s method (gGFR); Gate’s method with the verify formulae of depth (v-gGFR); and dual plasma sampling method (rGFR). gGFR and v-gGFR were compared with rGFR. In v-gGFR, instead of Tonnesen’s formula, which was used to estimate the renal depth in Gate’a methoe, we adopted the renal depth formula obtained in our previous study: right kidney depth (cm) = 15.449 × (weight/height) + 0.09637 × age + 0.782; right kidney depth (cm) = 16.772 × (weight/height) + 0.01025 × age + 0.224( weight, kg; height, cm). All statistics were performed using SPSS 10.0. The estimated gGFR and v-gGFR were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. The spearman correlation and linear regression were used to describe the relationship between gGFR/v-gGFR and rGFR. The precision was expressed as the width between the 95% limits of agreement. Results Both gGFR and v-gGFR were correlated well with rGFR(r=0.75, P Conclusions In this research, the GFR obtained by the new formula of kidney depth was more accurate than GFR estimated by tradional radionuclide renal scintigraphy

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1678 Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of kidney depth in calculating GFR with radionuclide renal scintigraphy. Methods The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of kidney depth in calculating GFR with radionuclide renal scintigraphy. Methods 482 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were enrolled. GFR were estimated simultaneously using modified Gate’s method (gGFR); Gate’s method with the verify formulae of depth (v-gGFR); and dual plasma sampling method (rGFR). gGFR and v-gGFR were compared with rGFR. In v-gGFR, instead of Tonnesen’s formula, which was used to estimate the renal depth in Gate’a methoe, we adopted the renal depth formula obtained in our previous study: right kidney depth (cm) = 15.449 × (weight/height) + 0.09637 × age + 0.782; right kidney depth (cm) = 16.772 × (weight/height) + 0.01025 × age + 0.224( weight, kg; height, cm). All statistics were performed using SPSS 10.0. The estimated gGFR and v-gGFR were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. The spearman correlation and linear regression were used to describe the relationship between gGFR/v-gGFR and rGFR. The precision was expressed as the width between the 95% limits of agreement. Results Both gGFR and v-gGFR were correlated well with rGFR(r=0.75, P Conclusions In this research, the GFR obtained by the new formula of kidney depth was more accurate than GFR estimated by tradional radionuclide renal scintigraphy

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1678 Objectives The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of kidney depth in calculating GFR with radionuclide renal scintigraphy. Methods The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of kidney depth in calculating GFR with radionuclide renal scintigraphy. Methods 482 patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were enrolled. GFR were estimated simultaneously using modified Gate’s method (gGFR); Gate’s method with the verify formulae of depth (v-gGFR); and dual plasma sampling method (rGFR). gGFR and v-gGFR were compared with rGFR. In v-gGFR, instead of Tonnesen’s formula, which was used to estimate the renal depth in Gate’a methoe, we adopted the renal depth formula obtained in our previous study: right kidney depth (cm) = 15.449 × (weight/height) + 0.09637 × age + 0.782; right kidney depth (cm) = 16.772 × (weight/height) + 0.01025 × age + 0.224( weight, kg; height, cm). All statistics were performed using SPSS 10.0. The estimated gGFR and v-gGFR were compared using Bland-Altman analysis. The spearman correlation and linear regression were used to describe the relationship between gGFR/v-gGFR and rGFR. The precision was expressed as the width between the 95% limits of agreement. Results Both gGFR and v-gGFR were correlated well with rGFR(r=0.75, P Conclusions In this research, the GFR obtained by the new formula of kidney depth was more accurate than GFR estimated by tradional radionuclide renal scintigraphy

Key concepts: Renal function, Kidney, Nuclear medicine, Urology, Scintigraphy, Radionuclide, Kidney disease, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of the influence of kidney depth in GFR with radionuclide renal scintigraphy — Research Paper | ScholarLens