2019•Unpublished venueRequires access

Optimization of GFR value according to kidney depth measurement methods

Hyeong Jin Kwon, Keon Wook Kang, Gyeong Woon Noh

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

3033 Purpose: In patients with unusual kidney position after 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging study, the GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) values are significantly different according to the depth of the kidney. Thus, we tried to compare the difference of the GFR values between the depth measurement methods and in vitro test. Materials and Methods: 30 adult patients who were subjected to renal(DTPA) study. 27 patients were in usual position and 3 patients were in unusual. 555±37 MBq of 99mTc-DTPA was administrated to all patients. GE infinia gamma camera was used. GFR values were obtained in vivo(gates method) and vitro(blood). The kidney depth in vivo was calculated by three methods(Tonnensen, Manual, Taylor). In vitro, GFR was performed by blood test. Differences in the mean values of GFR and correlations between kidney depth and GFR values were evaluated using the SPSS 12.0 statistical program. Results: The GFR values for 27 patients with kidney in the usual position are as follows(1.Tonnensen 2.Manual 3.Taylor 4.Invitro); 69.3±4.2, 88.2±5.6, 77.8±4.3, 82.2±5.8. The three unusual cases are as follows, first(congenital renal anomaly): 66.4, 101.24, 69.07, 94.8, second(transplantation kidney): 12.22, 29.99, 19.36, 23.5, third(horseshoe kidney): 37.37, 93.54, 35.9, 92.5. There was a difference between tonnensen and manual in the usual position of the kidneys(p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the other methods. However, there was a significant difference in case of the unusual position of the kidneys. Correlation analysis between both kidney depth and GFR value shows pearson correlation as follows; Rt kidney: 0.298, Lt kidney: 0.322. Conclusions: When compared with the GFR values in vitro test, it was useful to calculate the GFR value by measuring the kidney depth using a manual formula in the unusual position of the kidneys . GFR values and kidney depth were significantly related.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

3033 Purpose: In patients with unusual kidney position after 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging study, the GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) values are significantly different according to the depth of the kidney. Thus, we tried to compare the difference of the GFR values between the depth measurement methods and in vitro test. Materials and Methods: 30 adult patients who were subjected to renal(DTPA) study. 27 patients were in usual position and 3 patients were in unusual. 555±37 MBq of 99mTc-DTPA was administrated to all patients. GE infinia gamma camera was used. GFR values were obtained in vivo(gates method) and vitro(blood). The kidney depth in vivo was calculated by three methods(Tonnensen, Manual, Taylor). In vitro, GFR was performed by blood test. Differences in the mean values of GFR and correlations between kidney depth and GFR values were evaluated using the SPSS 12.0 statistical program. Results: The GFR values for 27 patients with kidney in the usual position are as follows(1.Tonnensen 2.Manual 3.Taylor 4.Invitro); 69.3±4.2, 88.2±5.6, 77.8±4.3, 82.2±5.8. The three unusual cases are as follows, first(congenital renal anomaly): 66.4, 101.24, 69.07, 94.8, second(transplantation kidney): 12.22, 29.99, 19.36, 23.5, third(horseshoe kidney): 37.37, 93.54, 35.9, 92.5. There was a difference between tonnensen and manual in the usual position of the kidneys(p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the other methods. However, there was a significant difference in case of the unusual position of the kidneys. Correlation analysis between both kidney depth and GFR value shows pearson correlation as follows; Rt kidney: 0.298, Lt kidney: 0.322. Conclusions: When compared with the GFR values in vitro test, it was useful to calculate the GFR value by measuring the kidney depth using a manual formula in the unusual position of the kidneys . GFR values and kidney depth were significantly related.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

3033 Purpose: In patients with unusual kidney position after 99mTc-DTPA renal dynamic imaging study, the GFR (Glomerular Filtration Rate) values are significantly different according to the depth of the kidney. Thus, we tried to compare the difference of the GFR values between the depth measurement methods and in vitro test. Materials and Methods: 30 adult patients who were subjected to renal(DTPA) study. 27 patients were in usual position and 3 patients were in unusual. 555±37 MBq of 99mTc-DTPA was administrated to all patients. GE infinia gamma camera was used. GFR values were obtained in vivo(gates method) and vitro(blood). The kidney depth in vivo was calculated by three methods(Tonnensen, Manual, Taylor). In vitro, GFR was performed by blood test. Differences in the mean values of GFR and correlations between kidney depth and GFR values were evaluated using the SPSS 12.0 statistical program. Results: The GFR values for 27 patients with kidney in the usual position are as follows(1.Tonnensen 2.Manual 3.Taylor 4.Invitro); 69.3±4.2, 88.2±5.6, 77.8±4.3, 82.2±5.8. The three unusual cases are as follows, first(congenital renal anomaly): 66.4, 101.24, 69.07, 94.8, second(transplantation kidney): 12.22, 29.99, 19.36, 23.5, third(horseshoe kidney): 37.37, 93.54, 35.9, 92.5. There was a difference between tonnensen and manual in the usual position of the kidneys(p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the other methods. However, there was a significant difference in case of the unusual position of the kidneys. Correlation analysis between both kidney depth and GFR value shows pearson correlation as follows; Rt kidney: 0.298, Lt kidney: 0.322. Conclusions: When compared with the GFR values in vitro test, it was useful to calculate the GFR value by measuring the kidney depth using a manual formula in the unusual position of the kidneys . GFR values and kidney depth were significantly related.

Key concepts: Kidney, Renal function, Urology, Medicine, Gamma camera, Kidney transplantation, Horseshoe kidney, Nuclear medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Optimization of GFR value according to kidney depth measurement methods — Research Paper | ScholarLens