2009DukeSpace (Duke University)Open access

A Discussion of the Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) within the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Division of Hydropower Licensing and a Comparison of NEPA within Their Three Licensing Procedures

Carolyn L. Templeton

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to integrate\nenvironmental values into their decision making processes by considering the environmental\nimpacts of their proposed actions and reasonable alternatives to those actions. Under the\nauthority of the Federal Power Act, as amended,1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission\n(Commission or FERC) has the exclusive authority to license most nonfederal hydropower\nprojects located on navigable waterways or federal lands, or connected to the interstate electric\ngrid. Applicants for licenses may use the integrated, traditional, or alternative licensing process.\nThis paper discusses the implementation of NEPA within the Commission’s Division of\nHydropower Licensing (DHL) and analyzes the three aforementioned licensing processes. Issues\nsuch as purpose and need and establishing reasonable and viable alternatives will be discussed\nand areas such as tribal consultation, scoping, and preparation of the environmental document\nwill be contrasted and compared.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to integrate\nenvironmental values into their decision making processes by considering the environmental\nimpacts of their proposed actions and reasonable alternatives to those actions. Under the\nauthority of the Federal Power Act, as amended,1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission\n(Commission or FERC) has the exclusive authority to license most nonfederal hydropower\nprojects located on navigable waterways or federal lands, or connected to the interstate electric\ngrid. Applicants for licenses may use the integrated, traditional, or alternative licensing process.\nThis paper discusses the implementation of NEPA within the Commission’s Division of\nHydropower Licensing (DHL) and analyzes the three aforementioned licensing processes. Issues\nsuch as purpose and need and establishing reasonable and viable alternatives will be discussed\nand areas such as tribal consultation, scoping, and preparation of the environmental document\nwill be contrasted and compared.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to integrate\nenvironmental values into their decision making processes by considering the environmental\nimpacts of their proposed actions and reasonable alternatives to those actions. Under the\nauthority of the Federal Power Act, as amended,1 the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission\n(Commission or FERC) has the exclusive authority to license most nonfederal hydropower\nprojects located on navigable waterways or federal lands, or connected to the interstate electric\ngrid. Applicants for licenses may use the integrated, traditional, or alternative licensing process.\nThis paper discusses the implementation of NEPA within the Commission’s Division of\nHydropower Licensing (DHL) and analyzes the three aforementioned licensing processes. Issues\nsuch as purpose and need and establishing reasonable and viable alternatives will be discussed\nand areas such as tribal consultation, scoping, and preparation of the environmental document\nwill be contrasted and compared.

Key concepts: National Environmental Policy Act, Commission, Environmental impact statement, Hydropower, Business, Environmental planning, Division (mathematics), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Discussion of the Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) within the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's Division of Hydropower Licensing and a Comparison of NEPA within Their Three Licensing Procedures — Research Paper | ScholarLens