2012DukeSpace (Duke University)Open access

NEPA Compliance with Classified Actions

Nadine Searles

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In 1970 President Richard M. Nixon signed the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). As part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) was established by Congress ensuring all federal agencies meet their obligations under NEPA. With the enactment of NEPA, all federal agencies are required to submit an environmental impact statement (EIS) which identifies and evaluates all environmental impacts (adverse or beneficial); all effects (direct, indirect or cumulative), and any reasonable alternatives on all federal projects. The EIS shows that all impacts with regard to natural and cultural resources and its effects were evaluated and analyzed to the fullest extent possible and must be made available to the public and other federal agencies for review and comments. This process captures the intent of NEPA and provides the decisionmakers with the best choice. However, with the Global War on Terrorism and heightened National Security issues; how do we complete the NEPA process involving classified projects/materials? Is there any environmental oversight for classified information or is it subjected to an environmental exemption? \n The following paper discusses complying with the NEPA process with regard to classified projects/materials; the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Presidential exemptions and case law.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 1970 President Richard M. Nixon signed the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). As part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) was established by Congress ensuring all federal agencies meet their obligations under NEPA. With the enactment of NEPA, all federal agencies are required to submit an environmental impact statement (EIS) which identifies and evaluates all environmental impacts (adverse or beneficial); all effects (direct, indirect or cumulative), and any reasonable alternatives on all federal projects. The EIS shows that all impacts with regard to natural and cultural resources and its effects were evaluated and analyzed to the fullest extent possible and must be made available to the public and other federal agencies for review and comments. This process captures the intent of NEPA and provides the decisionmakers with the best choice. However, with the Global War on Terrorism and heightened National Security issues; how do we complete the NEPA process involving classified projects/materials? Is there any environmental oversight for classified information or is it subjected to an environmental exemption? \n The following paper discusses complying with the NEPA process with regard to classified projects/materials; the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Presidential exemptions and case law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 1970 President Richard M. Nixon signed the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). As part of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) was established by Congress ensuring all federal agencies meet their obligations under NEPA. With the enactment of NEPA, all federal agencies are required to submit an environmental impact statement (EIS) which identifies and evaluates all environmental impacts (adverse or beneficial); all effects (direct, indirect or cumulative), and any reasonable alternatives on all federal projects. The EIS shows that all impacts with regard to natural and cultural resources and its effects were evaluated and analyzed to the fullest extent possible and must be made available to the public and other federal agencies for review and comments. This process captures the intent of NEPA and provides the decisionmakers with the best choice. However, with the Global War on Terrorism and heightened National Security issues; how do we complete the NEPA process involving classified projects/materials? Is there any environmental oversight for classified information or is it subjected to an environmental exemption? \n The following paper discusses complying with the NEPA process with regard to classified projects/materials; the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Presidential exemptions and case law.

Key concepts: National Environmental Policy Act, Environmental impact statement, Environmental law, Environmental impact assessment, Public administration, Political science, Business, Environmental planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
NEPA Compliance with Classified Actions — Research Paper | ScholarLens