1998The Indian Journal of Agricultural SciencesOpen access

Evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) lines for advantage in intercropping systems

J. G. Jagtap, Somnath K. Holkar

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 1991-93 to evaluate 4 genotypes of pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and 2 genotypes of soybean [Glycine max'(l.) Merr.] in soybean-based intercropping system to study the advantage of intercropping. The results interpreted indicating that the various lines of pigeonpea selected from the promising genotype 'ICPL 87' showed a Ya1;able response with soybean genotypes in intercropping. The intercropping of soybean-pigeonpea genotypes gave land-equivalent ratio of 1.26-1.36. Only 5 out of 8 intercropping treatments of soybean and pigeonpea genotypes gave an economic advantage of 1 (monetary equivalent ratio 1.01) to 11 % (monetary equivalent ratio 1.11) compared with the most economic sole crop in respect to grain yield. The disparity between the values of land-equivalent ratio and monetary equivalent ratio indicates that substantial agronomic advantage does not guarantee an economic advantage in intercropping.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A field experiment was conducted during 1991-93 to evaluate 4 genotypes of pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and 2 genotypes of soybean [Glycine max'(l.) Merr.] in soybean-based intercropping system to study the advantage of intercropping. The results interpreted indicating that the various lines of pigeonpea selected from the promising genotype 'ICPL 87' showed a Ya1;able response with soybean genotypes in intercropping. The intercropping of soybean-pigeonpea genotypes gave land-equivalent ratio of 1.26-1.36. Only 5 out of 8 intercropping treatments of soybean and pigeonpea genotypes gave an economic advantage of 1 (monetary equivalent ratio 1.01) to 11 % (monetary equivalent ratio 1.11) compared with the most economic sole crop in respect to grain yield. The disparity between the values of land-equivalent ratio and monetary equivalent ratio indicates that substantial agronomic advantage does not guarantee an economic advantage in intercropping.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 1991-93 to evaluate 4 genotypes of pigeon pea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.] and 2 genotypes of soybean [Glycine max'(l.) Merr.] in soybean-based intercropping system to study the advantage of intercropping. The results interpreted indicating that the various lines of pigeonpea selected from the promising genotype 'ICPL 87' showed a Ya1;able response with soybean genotypes in intercropping. The intercropping of soybean-pigeonpea genotypes gave land-equivalent ratio of 1.26-1.36. Only 5 out of 8 intercropping treatments of soybean and pigeonpea genotypes gave an economic advantage of 1 (monetary equivalent ratio 1.01) to 11 % (monetary equivalent ratio 1.11) compared with the most economic sole crop in respect to grain yield. The disparity between the values of land-equivalent ratio and monetary equivalent ratio indicates that substantial agronomic advantage does not guarantee an economic advantage in intercropping.

Key concepts: Cajanus, Intercropping, Glycine, Field experiment, Agronomy, Grain yield, Crop, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) and pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) lines for advantage in intercropping systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens