2018Journal of Pharmacognosy and PhytochemistryOpen access

Effect of intercropping systems on pigeon pea equivalent yield under different land configuration

H. S. Garud, B.V. Asewar, G. S. Khazi, VK Khargkharate, G. D. Gadade

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm of AICRP for dryland Agriculture, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani to study the effect of different intercropping systems on pigeonpea equivalent yield under various land configurations entitled “Performance of different land configuration under pigeonpea based intercropping systems” It was observed that pigeonpea equivalent yield were significantly affected due to different intercropping systems. Pigeonpea+greengram intercropping system (I2) tended to give the highest pigeonpea seed eqivalent yield (1832 Kg ha-1). Among different land configiration highest pigeonpea equivalent yield recorded by broad bed (1823 Kg ha-1) furrow followed by ridges and furrow (11759 Kg ha-1) and lowest recorded in flat bed sowing (1416 Kg ha-1). The gross monetary returns was influenced significantly due to different intercropping systems. Pigeonpea+greengram recorded maximum gross monetary returns than other intercropping system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm of AICRP for dryland Agriculture, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani to study the effect of different intercropping systems on pigeonpea equivalent yield under various land configurations entitled “Performance of different land configuration under pigeonpea based intercropping systems” It was observed that pigeonpea equivalent yield were significantly affected due to different intercropping systems. Pigeonpea+greengram intercropping system (I2) tended to give the highest pigeonpea seed eqivalent yield (1832 Kg ha-1). Among different land configiration highest pigeonpea equivalent yield recorded by broad bed (1823 Kg ha-1) furrow followed by ridges and furrow (11759 Kg ha-1) and lowest recorded in flat bed sowing (1416 Kg ha-1). The gross monetary returns was influenced significantly due to different intercropping systems. Pigeonpea+greengram recorded maximum gross monetary returns than other intercropping system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A field experiment was conducted at experimental farm of AICRP for dryland Agriculture, V.N.M.K.V., Parbhani to study the effect of different intercropping systems on pigeonpea equivalent yield under various land configurations entitled “Performance of different land configuration under pigeonpea based intercropping systems” It was observed that pigeonpea equivalent yield were significantly affected due to different intercropping systems. Pigeonpea+greengram intercropping system (I2) tended to give the highest pigeonpea seed eqivalent yield (1832 Kg ha-1). Among different land configiration highest pigeonpea equivalent yield recorded by broad bed (1823 Kg ha-1) furrow followed by ridges and furrow (11759 Kg ha-1) and lowest recorded in flat bed sowing (1416 Kg ha-1). The gross monetary returns was influenced significantly due to different intercropping systems. Pigeonpea+greengram recorded maximum gross monetary returns than other intercropping system.

Key concepts: Intercropping, Sowing, Yield (engineering), Agronomy, Mathematics, Agriculture, Field experiment, Agroforestry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of intercropping systems on pigeon pea equivalent yield under different land configuration — Research Paper | ScholarLens