2014•UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria)Open access

Section 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 : a retrospective and critical appraisal of some unresolved issues

Linda Schoeman-Malan, Francois du Toit, Anton Van der Linde, James Faber

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

This article traces the history of s 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 – the Act’s \nso-called ‘condonation provision’. It examines the reasons for the legislature’s \nintroduction of a rescue provision in regard to formally irregular wills and \namendments of wills, and surveys the manner in which South African courts \nhave engaged with testamentary condonation to date. The article pays \nparticular attention to three matters regarding s 2(3) that still pose challenges to \ncourts in their engagement with testamentary rescue: the precise ambit of the \ncondonation provision’s document requirement; some difficulties associated \nwith the subsection’s intention requirement; and the question whether the \nsubsection demands substantial compliance with execution and/or amendment \nformalities before condonation can occur. The authors submit that these \nunresolved matters require further legislative attention.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article traces the history of s 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 – the Act’s \nso-called ‘condonation provision’. It examines the reasons for the legislature’s \nintroduction of a rescue provision in regard to formally irregular wills and \namendments of wills, and surveys the manner in which South African courts \nhave engaged with testamentary condonation to date. The article pays \nparticular attention to three matters regarding s 2(3) that still pose challenges to \ncourts in their engagement with testamentary rescue: the precise ambit of the \ncondonation provision’s document requirement; some difficulties associated \nwith the subsection’s intention requirement; and the question whether the \nsubsection demands substantial compliance with execution and/or amendment \nformalities before condonation can occur. The authors submit that these \nunresolved matters require further legislative attention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article traces the history of s 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 – the Act’s \nso-called ‘condonation provision’. It examines the reasons for the legislature’s \nintroduction of a rescue provision in regard to formally irregular wills and \namendments of wills, and surveys the manner in which South African courts \nhave engaged with testamentary condonation to date. The article pays \nparticular attention to three matters regarding s 2(3) that still pose challenges to \ncourts in their engagement with testamentary rescue: the precise ambit of the \ncondonation provision’s document requirement; some difficulties associated \nwith the subsection’s intention requirement; and the question whether the \nsubsection demands substantial compliance with execution and/or amendment \nformalities before condonation can occur. The authors submit that these \nunresolved matters require further legislative attention.

Key concepts: Testamentary trust, Legislative history, Legislature, Law, Section (typography), Settlor, Compliance (psychology), Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Section 2(3) of the Wills Act 7 of 1953 : a retrospective and critical appraisal of some unresolved issues — Research Paper | ScholarLens