1978•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

A Lawyer Looks at Parliament

Kenneth J. Keith

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This article is concerned with the preparation of legislation and with its interpretation and application. The author considers the statute book both in general and in detail. He first explains the overall shape and size of the New Zealand statute book and then considers three particular statutes: the Commerce Act 1975, the Transport Act 1962, and the Town and Country Planning Act 1953. The author tests the general criticisms of legislation – its complex language, over-elaboration, illogical structure, inconsistency and drafting repetition – by reference to these statutes. This leads to a consideration of the methods of construction, interpretation and application employed by the Courts. The article concludes by asking briefly whether New Zealand should enact a Bill of Rights and thereby change the balance between the Courts and the legislature.Abstract by Juliet Bull.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article is concerned with the preparation of legislation and with its interpretation and application. The author considers the statute book both in general and in detail. He first explains the overall shape and size of the New Zealand statute book and then considers three particular statutes: the Commerce Act 1975, the Transport Act 1962, and the Town and Country Planning Act 1953. The author tests the general criticisms of legislation – its complex language, over-elaboration, illogical structure, inconsistency and drafting repetition – by reference to these statutes. This leads to a consideration of the methods of construction, interpretation and application employed by the Courts. The article concludes by asking briefly whether New Zealand should enact a Bill of Rights and thereby change the balance between the Courts and the legislature.Abstract by Juliet Bull.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article is concerned with the preparation of legislation and with its interpretation and application. The author considers the statute book both in general and in detail. He first explains the overall shape and size of the New Zealand statute book and then considers three particular statutes: the Commerce Act 1975, the Transport Act 1962, and the Town and Country Planning Act 1953. The author tests the general criticisms of legislation – its complex language, over-elaboration, illogical structure, inconsistency and drafting repetition – by reference to these statutes. This leads to a consideration of the methods of construction, interpretation and application employed by the Courts. The article concludes by asking briefly whether New Zealand should enact a Bill of Rights and thereby change the balance between the Courts and the legislature.Abstract by Juliet Bull.

Key concepts: Statute, Legislation, Parliament, Law, Interpretation (philosophy), Political science, Statutory interpretation, Legislature

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Lawyer Looks at Parliament — Research Paper | ScholarLens