1994•Korean Journal of Food Science and TechnologyRequires access

Effect of $CO_{2}$ Gas Packaging on the Shelf-life of Refrigerated Pork Cuts

Yongsu Kim, Yun‐Ji Kim, Ick-Jong Yoo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Shelf-life of pork packaged under was observed and the optimal volume of gas was determined. High gas barrier film, EVOH( permiability; 1 ) was used as packaging material and the volume ratios of sample to of 1 : 1, 1 : 3 and 1 : 5 were tried using the control of vacuum packaged pork. To ev.3luate quality of pork cuts, total plate counts, TBA, color and sensory score were monitored during the storage at for 31 days. TPC of vacuum packaged pork increased up to in 24 days while that of gas packaged pork at the same storage period, and it took 7 days more for gas packaged pork to reach the same TPC count. There was no significant difference in TBA value between vacuum packaged and gas packaged pork. In the color L and a values were not affected by treatment but vacuum packaged pork cuts showed higher b value than gas packaged pork. According to sensory evaluation, gas packaged pork showed less off flavor, better flavor and freshness than vacuum packaged one (P

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Shelf-life of pork packaged under was observed and the optimal volume of gas was determined. High gas barrier film, EVOH( permiability; 1 ) was used as packaging material and the volume ratios of sample to of 1 : 1, 1 : 3 and 1 : 5 were tried using the control of vacuum packaged pork. To ev.3luate quality of pork cuts, total plate counts, TBA, color and sensory score were monitored during the storage at for 31 days. TPC of vacuum packaged pork increased up to in 24 days while that of gas packaged pork at the same storage period, and it took 7 days more for gas packaged pork to reach the same TPC count. There was no significant difference in TBA value between vacuum packaged and gas packaged pork. In the color L and a values were not affected by treatment but vacuum packaged pork cuts showed higher b value than gas packaged pork. According to sensory evaluation, gas packaged pork showed less off flavor, better flavor and freshness than vacuum packaged one (P

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Shelf-life of pork packaged under was observed and the optimal volume of gas was determined. High gas barrier film, EVOH( permiability; 1 ) was used as packaging material and the volume ratios of sample to of 1 : 1, 1 : 3 and 1 : 5 were tried using the control of vacuum packaged pork. To ev.3luate quality of pork cuts, total plate counts, TBA, color and sensory score were monitored during the storage at for 31 days. TPC of vacuum packaged pork increased up to in 24 days while that of gas packaged pork at the same storage period, and it took 7 days more for gas packaged pork to reach the same TPC count. There was no significant difference in TBA value between vacuum packaged and gas packaged pork. In the color L and a values were not affected by treatment but vacuum packaged pork cuts showed higher b value than gas packaged pork. According to sensory evaluation, gas packaged pork showed less off flavor, better flavor and freshness than vacuum packaged one (P

Key concepts: Shelf life, Food science, Flavor, Vacuum packing, Chemistry, Volume (thermodynamics), Significant difference, Control sample

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of $CO_{2}$ Gas Packaging on the Shelf-life of Refrigerated Pork Cuts — Research Paper | ScholarLens