2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Increasing Funding and Accountability for Metropolitan Transportation Decisions

Robert Puentes, Linda Bailey

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses the effect f the suballocation rule by analyzing spending patterns of state departments of transportation and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOS). Metropolitan areas, the authors contend, require greater control over the transportation spending so crucial to their dynamism. To support their case, the authors examine federal transportation policy since the end of the interstate highway era and they find that only a few federal efforts explicitly serve to strengthen and support metropolitan decision making. The authors highlight four specific programmatic elements of the federal law that increased the ability of metropolitan areas to make transportation decisions: suballocated Surface Transportation Program dollars; the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality program; the Transportation Enhancements program; and metropolitan planning funds.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses the effect f the suballocation rule by analyzing spending patterns of state departments of transportation and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOS). Metropolitan areas, the authors contend, require greater control over the transportation spending so crucial to their dynamism. To support their case, the authors examine federal transportation policy since the end of the interstate highway era and they find that only a few federal efforts explicitly serve to strengthen and support metropolitan decision making. The authors highlight four specific programmatic elements of the federal law that increased the ability of metropolitan areas to make transportation decisions: suballocated Surface Transportation Program dollars; the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality program; the Transportation Enhancements program; and metropolitan planning funds.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses the effect f the suballocation rule by analyzing spending patterns of state departments of transportation and metropolitan planning organizations (MPOS). Metropolitan areas, the authors contend, require greater control over the transportation spending so crucial to their dynamism. To support their case, the authors examine federal transportation policy since the end of the interstate highway era and they find that only a few federal efforts explicitly serve to strengthen and support metropolitan decision making. The authors highlight four specific programmatic elements of the federal law that increased the ability of metropolitan areas to make transportation decisions: suballocated Surface Transportation Program dollars; the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality program; the Transportation Enhancements program; and metropolitan planning funds.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Business, Transportation planning, Dynamism, Public administration, Control (management), Transport engineering, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Increasing Funding and Accountability for Metropolitan Transportation Decisions — Research Paper | ScholarLens