2004Unpublished venueRequires access

Metropolitan Transportation Governance: Suballocation, Devolution, and the Quest for Better Decision-Making

Robert Puentes

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article explains that transportation is crucial to the success of metropolitan areas as they compete in the global economy, and argues, therefore, that funding sources and decision-making for metropolitan areas needs to be expanded under federal transportation law. It provides an historical overview of federal efforts to support metropolitan transportation decision processes. It also describes the four major elements of the federal surface transportation law that provides metropolitan areas with the ability to make transportation decisions. These include the Surface Transportation Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality program, the Metropolitan Planning Program, and the Transportation Enhancements Program. The article suggests that in too many instances state departments of transportation have too much authority over projects selected by metropolitan planning organizations. The article concludes with several suggestions to remedy the current situation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article explains that transportation is crucial to the success of metropolitan areas as they compete in the global economy, and argues, therefore, that funding sources and decision-making for metropolitan areas needs to be expanded under federal transportation law. It provides an historical overview of federal efforts to support metropolitan transportation decision processes. It also describes the four major elements of the federal surface transportation law that provides metropolitan areas with the ability to make transportation decisions. These include the Surface Transportation Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality program, the Metropolitan Planning Program, and the Transportation Enhancements Program. The article suggests that in too many instances state departments of transportation have too much authority over projects selected by metropolitan planning organizations. The article concludes with several suggestions to remedy the current situation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article explains that transportation is crucial to the success of metropolitan areas as they compete in the global economy, and argues, therefore, that funding sources and decision-making for metropolitan areas needs to be expanded under federal transportation law. It provides an historical overview of federal efforts to support metropolitan transportation decision processes. It also describes the four major elements of the federal surface transportation law that provides metropolitan areas with the ability to make transportation decisions. These include the Surface Transportation Program, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality program, the Metropolitan Planning Program, and the Transportation Enhancements Program. The article suggests that in too many instances state departments of transportation have too much authority over projects selected by metropolitan planning organizations. The article concludes with several suggestions to remedy the current situation.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Transportation planning, Business, Corporate governance, Public administration, Devolution (biology), Transport engineering, Regional science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Metropolitan Transportation Governance: Suballocation, Devolution, and the Quest for Better Decision-Making — Research Paper | ScholarLens