2006PubMedRequires access

A comparative assessment of HER2 status in operable breast cancer by real-time RT-PCR and by immunohistochemistry.

Piotr Potemski, Elżbieta Płuciennik, Andrzej K. Bednarek, Renata Kusińska, Grażyna Pasz‐Walczak, Dorota Jesionek‐Kupnicka, Cezary Watała, Radzisław Kordek

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The most commonly used methods for detecting HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer are immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess HER2 expression by real-time RT-PCR. MATERIAL/METHODS: Expression of HER2 was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry in specimens of invasive ductal breast cancer tissue obtained from 131 women during radical mastectomy. RESULTS: There was a highly significant difference in mean relative gene expression between HER2-positive and HER2-negative patients as assessed by immunostaining (22.10+/-41.89 vs. 3.17+/-8.76; p<0.001). With a median follow-up of 56 months, the cancer-specific survival of HER2-positive patients assessed by RT-PCR was worse in all cases and in the node-positive group. In multivariate analysis, HER2 status was an independent prognostic factor in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time RT-PCR is a valuable method for determining HER2 status, but the selection of the cut-off point of the relative gene expression differentiating between HER2-negative and -positive tumors is essential.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The most commonly used methods for detecting HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer are immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess HER2 expression by real-time RT-PCR. MATERIAL/METHODS: Expression of HER2 was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry in specimens of invasive ductal breast cancer tissue obtained from 131 women during radical mastectomy. RESULTS: There was a highly significant difference in mean relative gene expression between HER2-positive and HER2-negative patients as assessed by immunostaining (22.10+/-41.89 vs. 3.17+/-8.76; p<0.001). With a median follow-up of 56 months, the cancer-specific survival of HER2-positive patients assessed by RT-PCR was worse in all cases and in the node-positive group. In multivariate analysis, HER2 status was an independent prognostic factor in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time RT-PCR is a valuable method for determining HER2 status, but the selection of the cut-off point of the relative gene expression differentiating between HER2-negative and -positive tumors is essential.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The most commonly used methods for detecting HER2 gene amplification in breast cancer are immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in-situ hybridization. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess HER2 expression by real-time RT-PCR. MATERIAL/METHODS: Expression of HER2 was analyzed by real-time RT-PCR and immunohistochemistry in specimens of invasive ductal breast cancer tissue obtained from 131 women during radical mastectomy. RESULTS: There was a highly significant difference in mean relative gene expression between HER2-positive and HER2-negative patients as assessed by immunostaining (22.10+/-41.89 vs. 3.17+/-8.76; p<0.001). With a median follow-up of 56 months, the cancer-specific survival of HER2-positive patients assessed by RT-PCR was worse in all cases and in the node-positive group. In multivariate analysis, HER2 status was an independent prognostic factor in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time RT-PCR is a valuable method for determining HER2 status, but the selection of the cut-off point of the relative gene expression differentiating between HER2-negative and -positive tumors is essential.

Key concepts: Immunohistochemistry, Breast cancer, Medicine, Oncology, Immunostaining, Real-time polymerase chain reaction, Cancer, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative assessment of HER2 status in operable breast cancer by real-time RT-PCR and by immunohistochemistry. — Research Paper | ScholarLens