2012PubMedRequires access

Immediate implant placement and restoration in infected sites.

Alan Meltzer

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

The long-standing assumption that active infection is a contraindication for immediate implant placement has been challenged recently. High implant survival rates have been reported even when implants were placed immediately in infected extraction sockets and provisionalized within 36 hours. To further evaluate the impact of nonocclusal loading on implants placed in cleaned periodontically or endodontically infected extraction sites, this retrospective study examined the results of 77 implants placed in 63 patients and followed for between 3 and 24 months. Initial primary stability was achieved for all implants, and reverse torque testing at 3 and 4 months postoperatively showed 76 of 77 implants (98.7%) to be successfully osseointegrated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The long-standing assumption that active infection is a contraindication for immediate implant placement has been challenged recently. High implant survival rates have been reported even when implants were placed immediately in infected extraction sockets and provisionalized within 36 hours. To further evaluate the impact of nonocclusal loading on implants placed in cleaned periodontically or endodontically infected extraction sites, this retrospective study examined the results of 77 implants placed in 63 patients and followed for between 3 and 24 months. Initial primary stability was achieved for all implants, and reverse torque testing at 3 and 4 months postoperatively showed 76 of 77 implants (98.7%) to be successfully osseointegrated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The long-standing assumption that active infection is a contraindication for immediate implant placement has been challenged recently. High implant survival rates have been reported even when implants were placed immediately in infected extraction sockets and provisionalized within 36 hours. To further evaluate the impact of nonocclusal loading on implants placed in cleaned periodontically or endodontically infected extraction sites, this retrospective study examined the results of 77 implants placed in 63 patients and followed for between 3 and 24 months. Initial primary stability was achieved for all implants, and reverse torque testing at 3 and 4 months postoperatively showed 76 of 77 implants (98.7%) to be successfully osseointegrated.

Key concepts: Contraindication, Osseointegration, Implant, Medicine, Dentistry, Retrospective cohort study, Surgery, Pathology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Immediate implant placement and restoration in infected sites. — Research Paper | ScholarLens