2012PubMedRequires access

[Baseline analysis of refractory primary biliary cirrhosis].

Li Wang, Fang Kong, Xuan Zhang, Dong Xu, Zhao-jun Hu, Yongzhe Li, Fengchun Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the clinical characters of refractory primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) versus typical ones and explore the risk factors of prognosis. METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, 60 PBC patients on the therapy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) over 1 year at our clinic were recruited. According to the response to UDCA by the Paris criteria, they were divided into refractory group (n = 23) and typical group (n = 37) to analyze the basic clinical conditions, biochemical markers, antibodies and liver biopsies. RESULTS: (1) Compared with the typical patients, the refractory ones had more fatigue (73.9% vs 45.9%), pruritus (60.9% vs 40.5%) and jaundice (43.4% vs 18.9%); (2) the serum level of biomarkers (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL) and immunoglobulin M (IgM)) were higher in the refractory group (P < 0.05); (3) no differences existed between two groups in age, gender, antibodies (antinuclear antibody (ANA), antimitochondrial antibody (AMA), AMA-M2, anti-GP210, anti-SP100 and anti-centromere antibody (ACA)) or liver biopsies. CONCLUSION: Some clinical severe manifestation (fatigue, pruritus and jaundice) and higher biochemical markers levels (ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, TBIL, DBIL and IgM) seem to predict a worse response to UDCA and a rapid progression of disease in PBC patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the clinical characters of refractory primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) versus typical ones and explore the risk factors of prognosis. METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, 60 PBC patients on the therapy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) over 1 year at our clinic were recruited. According to the response to UDCA by the Paris criteria, they were divided into refractory group (n = 23) and typical group (n = 37) to analyze the basic clinical conditions, biochemical markers, antibodies and liver biopsies. RESULTS: (1) Compared with the typical patients, the refractory ones had more fatigue (73.9% vs 45.9%), pruritus (60.9% vs 40.5%) and jaundice (43.4% vs 18.9%); (2) the serum level of biomarkers (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL) and immunoglobulin M (IgM)) were higher in the refractory group (P < 0.05); (3) no differences existed between two groups in age, gender, antibodies (antinuclear antibody (ANA), antimitochondrial antibody (AMA), AMA-M2, anti-GP210, anti-SP100 and anti-centromere antibody (ACA)) or liver biopsies. CONCLUSION: Some clinical severe manifestation (fatigue, pruritus and jaundice) and higher biochemical markers levels (ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, TBIL, DBIL and IgM) seem to predict a worse response to UDCA and a rapid progression of disease in PBC patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the clinical characters of refractory primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) versus typical ones and explore the risk factors of prognosis. METHODS: From 2009 to 2011, 60 PBC patients on the therapy of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) over 1 year at our clinic were recruited. According to the response to UDCA by the Paris criteria, they were divided into refractory group (n = 23) and typical group (n = 37) to analyze the basic clinical conditions, biochemical markers, antibodies and liver biopsies. RESULTS: (1) Compared with the typical patients, the refractory ones had more fatigue (73.9% vs 45.9%), pruritus (60.9% vs 40.5%) and jaundice (43.4% vs 18.9%); (2) the serum level of biomarkers (alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL) and immunoglobulin M (IgM)) were higher in the refractory group (P < 0.05); (3) no differences existed between two groups in age, gender, antibodies (antinuclear antibody (ANA), antimitochondrial antibody (AMA), AMA-M2, anti-GP210, anti-SP100 and anti-centromere antibody (ACA)) or liver biopsies. CONCLUSION: Some clinical severe manifestation (fatigue, pruritus and jaundice) and higher biochemical markers levels (ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, TBIL, DBIL and IgM) seem to predict a worse response to UDCA and a rapid progression of disease in PBC patients.

Key concepts: Ursodeoxycholic acid, Gastroenterology, Medicine, Internal medicine, Primary biliary cirrhosis, Bilirubin, Anti-nuclear antibody, Jaundice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Baseline analysis of refractory primary biliary cirrhosis]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens