1975OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Regulatory and tax alternatives and the financing of electricity supply

D.P. Kamat, M.L. Baughman, Paul L. Joskow

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The efficacy of various regulatory and tax alternatives for improving the financial conditions of electric utilities is evaluated. The authors submit that the electric utility industry will be faced with serious shortages of capital over the next twenty years unless changes are made in current regulatory and/or tax policies that will help ease these shortages. A mathematical supply-demand-regulatory model is used to aid in the evaluation of the policy alternatives discussed. It is concluded that allowing a higher rate of return on equity (as high as 16%), or including at least a portion of construction work in progress in the rate base would significantly reduce the capital shortage. Often suggested tax alternatives such as increasing the investment tax credit rate or expensing preferred stock dividends are found to lack the intended impact. (11 references) (auth)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The efficacy of various regulatory and tax alternatives for improving the financial conditions of electric utilities is evaluated. The authors submit that the electric utility industry will be faced with serious shortages of capital over the next twenty years unless changes are made in current regulatory and/or tax policies that will help ease these shortages. A mathematical supply-demand-regulatory model is used to aid in the evaluation of the policy alternatives discussed. It is concluded that allowing a higher rate of return on equity (as high as 16%), or including at least a portion of construction work in progress in the rate base would significantly reduce the capital shortage. Often suggested tax alternatives such as increasing the investment tax credit rate or expensing preferred stock dividends are found to lack the intended impact. (11 references) (auth)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The efficacy of various regulatory and tax alternatives for improving the financial conditions of electric utilities is evaluated. The authors submit that the electric utility industry will be faced with serious shortages of capital over the next twenty years unless changes are made in current regulatory and/or tax policies that will help ease these shortages. A mathematical supply-demand-regulatory model is used to aid in the evaluation of the policy alternatives discussed. It is concluded that allowing a higher rate of return on equity (as high as 16%), or including at least a portion of construction work in progress in the rate base would significantly reduce the capital shortage. Often suggested tax alternatives such as increasing the investment tax credit rate or expensing preferred stock dividends are found to lack the intended impact. (11 references) (auth)

Key concepts: Economic shortage, Dividend, Tax rate, Business, Electricity, Economics, Finance, Tax credit

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Regulatory and tax alternatives and the financing of electricity supply — Research Paper | ScholarLens