1985Electr. Light Power; (United States)Requires access

Reagan tax proposals threaten electric utility cash flows

D. Utroska

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The administration's tax proposal will have a net negative impact on electric utility cash flows and require additional external financing. Reducing the corporate tax rate from 46 to 33% will directly benefit ratepayers by reducing the revenues required by utilities without hurting cash flows and will improve debt quality. Repeal of the investment tax credit, however, will have the largest impact on those companies making sizable new plant and equipment expenditures. Revenue requirements will increase to the extent that higher debt service costs or dividends must be passed along to ratepayers. The proposed capital cost recovery system (CCRS) prescribes depreciation schedules and recovery periods that produce neutral investment incentives across recovery classes, but analysts conclude that the reduced internal cash flows will force utilities into the capital markets more often.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The administration's tax proposal will have a net negative impact on electric utility cash flows and require additional external financing. Reducing the corporate tax rate from 46 to 33% will directly benefit ratepayers by reducing the revenues required by utilities without hurting cash flows and will improve debt quality. Repeal of the investment tax credit, however, will have the largest impact on those companies making sizable new plant and equipment expenditures. Revenue requirements will increase to the extent that higher debt service costs or dividends must be passed along to ratepayers. The proposed capital cost recovery system (CCRS) prescribes depreciation schedules and recovery periods that produce neutral investment incentives across recovery classes, but analysts conclude that the reduced internal cash flows will force utilities into the capital markets more often.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The administration's tax proposal will have a net negative impact on electric utility cash flows and require additional external financing. Reducing the corporate tax rate from 46 to 33% will directly benefit ratepayers by reducing the revenues required by utilities without hurting cash flows and will improve debt quality. Repeal of the investment tax credit, however, will have the largest impact on those companies making sizable new plant and equipment expenditures. Revenue requirements will increase to the extent that higher debt service costs or dividends must be passed along to ratepayers. The proposed capital cost recovery system (CCRS) prescribes depreciation schedules and recovery periods that produce neutral investment incentives across recovery classes, but analysts conclude that the reduced internal cash flows will force utilities into the capital markets more often.

Key concepts: Business, Finance, Tax credit, Cash flow, Depreciation (economics), Economics, Monetary economics, Debt

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Reagan tax proposals threaten electric utility cash flows — Research Paper | ScholarLens