Governance and performance in compliance versus non-compliance Chinese listed companies
On Kit Tam, Monica Tan, Helen Wei Hu
Abstract
On Kit Tam, Monica Tan, Helen Wei Hu
Abstract
Cases of corporate scandals and the misconduct of publicly listed companies (PLCs) are growing amid rapid economic development in China. Systematic research on governance factors affecting these corporate misconducts and their consequences is however scant. This study compares the key governance characteristics of Chinese PLCs that were found to have contravened regulatory compliance requirements (i.e., “non-compliance” PLCs) to those that were not (i.e., “compliance” PLCs). Based on a comparison between 53 pairs of compliance - and non-compliance-PLCs over the period from 2001 to 2006, our results show that there are significant differences between the two. We found that ownership concentration is higher in compliance firms that also compensate their directors and executives at higher levels. Furthermore, the results suggest that sound governance practices benefit firms socially and financially, and an effective internal monitoring mechanism can further differentiate good companies from bad companies such that the good companies perform better.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Cases of corporate scandals and the misconduct of publicly listed companies (PLCs) are growing amid rapid economic development in China. Systematic research on governance factors affecting these corporate misconducts and their consequences is however scant. This study compares the key governance characteristics of Chinese PLCs that were found to have contravened regulatory compliance requirements (i.e., “non-compliance” PLCs) to those that were not (i.e., “compliance” PLCs). Based on a comparison between 53 pairs of compliance - and non-compliance-PLCs over the period from 2001 to 2006, our results show that there are significant differences between the two. We found that ownership concentration is higher in compliance firms that also compensate their directors and executives at higher levels. Furthermore, the results suggest that sound governance practices benefit firms socially and financially, and an effective internal monitoring mechanism can further differentiate good companies from bad companies such that the good companies perform better.
Key concepts: Compliance (psychology), Corporate governance, Misconduct, Accounting, Business, China, Control (management), Finance