2016Academy of Management ProceedingsRequires access

The Influence of Relative Performance and Bad Apple Succession on Organizational Misconduct

Mark A. Davis, Marcus Z. Cox

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Both strain and culture theories represent independent and complementary explanations for misconduct in and by organizations. The relationship between performance and misconduct remains an open question in the strain tradition, while culture theories assume that leaders can facilitate as well as impede the dissemination of cultures of misconduct. Using a sample of FBS football programs, we find evidence that social-relative performance (the gap between performance and social aspirations) and leader succession are related to misconduct in unique ways. Contrary to previous research, the likelihood of misconduct diminished with increases in positive social-relative performance. Conversely, we observed an increased likelihood of misconduct with decreases in negative social-relative performance suggesting that FBS programs engage in misconduct when performance is just short of social aspirations. Our analysis also reveals that bad apple leader succession (new leaders associated with prior misconduct) increases the likelihood of subsequent misconduct. However, a diminished probability of misconduct occurs with untainted leader succession if compliance is central to the leader’s professional role.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Both strain and culture theories represent independent and complementary explanations for misconduct in and by organizations. The relationship between performance and misconduct remains an open question in the strain tradition, while culture theories assume that leaders can facilitate as well as impede the dissemination of cultures of misconduct. Using a sample of FBS football programs, we find evidence that social-relative performance (the gap between performance and social aspirations) and leader succession are related to misconduct in unique ways. Contrary to previous research, the likelihood of misconduct diminished with increases in positive social-relative performance. Conversely, we observed an increased likelihood of misconduct with decreases in negative social-relative performance suggesting that FBS programs engage in misconduct when performance is just short of social aspirations. Our analysis also reveals that bad apple leader succession (new leaders associated with prior misconduct) increases the likelihood of subsequent misconduct. However, a diminished probability of misconduct occurs with untainted leader succession if compliance is central to the leader’s professional role.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Both strain and culture theories represent independent and complementary explanations for misconduct in and by organizations. The relationship between performance and misconduct remains an open question in the strain tradition, while culture theories assume that leaders can facilitate as well as impede the dissemination of cultures of misconduct. Using a sample of FBS football programs, we find evidence that social-relative performance (the gap between performance and social aspirations) and leader succession are related to misconduct in unique ways. Contrary to previous research, the likelihood of misconduct diminished with increases in positive social-relative performance. Conversely, we observed an increased likelihood of misconduct with decreases in negative social-relative performance suggesting that FBS programs engage in misconduct when performance is just short of social aspirations. Our analysis also reveals that bad apple leader succession (new leaders associated with prior misconduct) increases the likelihood of subsequent misconduct. However, a diminished probability of misconduct occurs with untainted leader succession if compliance is central to the leader’s professional role.

Key concepts: Misconduct, Social psychology, Psychology, Criminology, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Influence of Relative Performance and Bad Apple Succession on Organizational Misconduct — Research Paper | ScholarLens