1986•Transportation research circularRequires access

ORGANIZATIONAL PLANNING FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES

D H Roper

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

An incident management program cannot be truly successful unlss there is a cooperative, coordinated attitude on the part of each of the agencies involved. The working relationship between the traffic engineering, maintenance, and enforcement organizations is particularly critical. All have a legitimate responsibility and authority at an accident scene; all have resources to help correct the situation and get traffic flowing normally again. Local agencies need to be included, too -- detoured traffic will frequently be operating on city streets. A host of other authorities also will be involved: fire departments, tow truck services, ambulance services, etc. The key is to meet together before an emergency and to plan how each agency can coordinate its necessary work with that of the other members of the team, all working toward a common goal. And keep in mind, from a traffic flow point of view, the goal is to get traffic back to normal as quickly as possible. Invariably, with this kind of informal multidisciplinary team, the question will come up: Who's in charge? In Los Angeles, the answer is that no one agency is in charge; consensus decisions are made by the team. This may fly in the face of some organizational theorists, but in the real world, it works well. (Author)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An incident management program cannot be truly successful unlss there is a cooperative, coordinated attitude on the part of each of the agencies involved. The working relationship between the traffic engineering, maintenance, and enforcement organizations is particularly critical. All have a legitimate responsibility and authority at an accident scene; all have resources to help correct the situation and get traffic flowing normally again. Local agencies need to be included, too -- detoured traffic will frequently be operating on city streets. A host of other authorities also will be involved: fire departments, tow truck services, ambulance services, etc. The key is to meet together before an emergency and to plan how each agency can coordinate its necessary work with that of the other members of the team, all working toward a common goal. And keep in mind, from a traffic flow point of view, the goal is to get traffic back to normal as quickly as possible. Invariably, with this kind of informal multidisciplinary team, the question will come up: Who's in charge? In Los Angeles, the answer is that no one agency is in charge; consensus decisions are made by the team. This may fly in the face of some organizational theorists, but in the real world, it works well. (Author)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An incident management program cannot be truly successful unlss there is a cooperative, coordinated attitude on the part of each of the agencies involved. The working relationship between the traffic engineering, maintenance, and enforcement organizations is particularly critical. All have a legitimate responsibility and authority at an accident scene; all have resources to help correct the situation and get traffic flowing normally again. Local agencies need to be included, too -- detoured traffic will frequently be operating on city streets. A host of other authorities also will be involved: fire departments, tow truck services, ambulance services, etc. The key is to meet together before an emergency and to plan how each agency can coordinate its necessary work with that of the other members of the team, all working toward a common goal. And keep in mind, from a traffic flow point of view, the goal is to get traffic back to normal as quickly as possible. Invariably, with this kind of informal multidisciplinary team, the question will come up: Who's in charge? In Los Angeles, the answer is that no one agency is in charge; consensus decisions are made by the team. This may fly in the face of some organizational theorists, but in the real world, it works well. (Author)

Key concepts: Agency (philosophy), Work (physics), Plan (archaeology), Truck, Public relations, Business, Multidisciplinary approach, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ORGANIZATIONAL PLANNING FOR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES — Research Paper | ScholarLens