1976Unpublished venueRequires access

LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT: ITS NATURE AND ROLE

J H Seamon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The U.S. Department of Transportation's policy to support efforts to develop a type of rail system which is less costly to build, operate and maintain than conventional rail transit (CRT) systems is noted, the rather arbitrary distinctions between the latter and light rail transit (LRT) systems are discussed, the principal characteristics of selected LRT systems are tabulated, and the key features common to all such systems are listed. The LRT systems may range from the simple streetcar line to the high capacity CRT and the heavy main-line commuter rail service. LRT's flexibility permits its operation anywhere that tracks and overhead wire can be constructed. This flexibility is derived from the overhead power collection and the ability to handle passengers at either high or low platforms. Significant cost savings and operating flexibility result from LRT's ability to run on open surface lines as well as in subways. Attention is focussed on certain noteworthy features of the Cleveland Shaker Heights LRT system, the MBTA Blue Line CRT system, and the San Francisco Muni Metro now under construction. It is suggested that any metropolitan area planning a new transit system or an unconstrained addition to an old system should consider LRT as an alternative.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The U.S. Department of Transportation's policy to support efforts to develop a type of rail system which is less costly to build, operate and maintain than conventional rail transit (CRT) systems is noted, the rather arbitrary distinctions between the latter and light rail transit (LRT) systems are discussed, the principal characteristics of selected LRT systems are tabulated, and the key features common to all such systems are listed. The LRT systems may range from the simple streetcar line to the high capacity CRT and the heavy main-line commuter rail service. LRT's flexibility permits its operation anywhere that tracks and overhead wire can be constructed. This flexibility is derived from the overhead power collection and the ability to handle passengers at either high or low platforms. Significant cost savings and operating flexibility result from LRT's ability to run on open surface lines as well as in subways. Attention is focussed on certain noteworthy features of the Cleveland Shaker Heights LRT system, the MBTA Blue Line CRT system, and the San Francisco Muni Metro now under construction. It is suggested that any metropolitan area planning a new transit system or an unconstrained addition to an old system should consider LRT as an alternative.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The U.S. Department of Transportation's policy to support efforts to develop a type of rail system which is less costly to build, operate and maintain than conventional rail transit (CRT) systems is noted, the rather arbitrary distinctions between the latter and light rail transit (LRT) systems are discussed, the principal characteristics of selected LRT systems are tabulated, and the key features common to all such systems are listed. The LRT systems may range from the simple streetcar line to the high capacity CRT and the heavy main-line commuter rail service. LRT's flexibility permits its operation anywhere that tracks and overhead wire can be constructed. This flexibility is derived from the overhead power collection and the ability to handle passengers at either high or low platforms. Significant cost savings and operating flexibility result from LRT's ability to run on open surface lines as well as in subways. Attention is focussed on certain noteworthy features of the Cleveland Shaker Heights LRT system, the MBTA Blue Line CRT system, and the San Francisco Muni Metro now under construction. It is suggested that any metropolitan area planning a new transit system or an unconstrained addition to an old system should consider LRT as an alternative.

Key concepts: Flexibility (engineering), Light rail transit, Metropolitan area, Overhead (engineering), Transport engineering, Transit (satellite), Public transport, Rapid transit

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT: ITS NATURE AND ROLE — Research Paper | ScholarLens