2015International Journal on Minority and Group RightsRequires access

Autonomy as a Possible Solution to Self-determination Disputes: Does It Really Work?

Kavus Abushov

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

The focus of this article concerns conditions in which autonomy may become a solution to a secessionist conflict, and why it works in certain cases but fails in others. It explores whether autonomy can be a generally applicable solution to complex self-determination disputes, or whether the cases of successful implementation are too specific, depending on specific circumstances. In other words, why has autonomy been accepted in certain cases, but refused in others? I analyse which entities are entitled to the right of secession, proceed to cases where autonomy has been a solution to secession, and finally discuss cases where autonomy-based solutions have failed. There is also some discussion of the conditions for an effective functioning of autonomy and power-sharing. Before proceeding to exploring the above-mentioned questions related to autonomy and power sharing, the legal nature of the right of self-determination and secession is explored.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The focus of this article concerns conditions in which autonomy may become a solution to a secessionist conflict, and why it works in certain cases but fails in others. It explores whether autonomy can be a generally applicable solution to complex self-determination disputes, or whether the cases of successful implementation are too specific, depending on specific circumstances. In other words, why has autonomy been accepted in certain cases, but refused in others? I analyse which entities are entitled to the right of secession, proceed to cases where autonomy has been a solution to secession, and finally discuss cases where autonomy-based solutions have failed. There is also some discussion of the conditions for an effective functioning of autonomy and power-sharing. Before proceeding to exploring the above-mentioned questions related to autonomy and power sharing, the legal nature of the right of self-determination and secession is explored.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The focus of this article concerns conditions in which autonomy may become a solution to a secessionist conflict, and why it works in certain cases but fails in others. It explores whether autonomy can be a generally applicable solution to complex self-determination disputes, or whether the cases of successful implementation are too specific, depending on specific circumstances. In other words, why has autonomy been accepted in certain cases, but refused in others? I analyse which entities are entitled to the right of secession, proceed to cases where autonomy has been a solution to secession, and finally discuss cases where autonomy-based solutions have failed. There is also some discussion of the conditions for an effective functioning of autonomy and power-sharing. Before proceeding to exploring the above-mentioned questions related to autonomy and power sharing, the legal nature of the right of self-determination and secession is explored.

Key concepts: Autonomy, Secession, Self-determination, Power (physics), Political science, Work (physics), Law and economics, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Autonomy as a Possible Solution to Self-determination Disputes: Does It Really Work? — Research Paper | ScholarLens