2023African Journal of International and Comparative LawOpen access

The Biafran Self-Determination Question: Challenges and Prospects

Judith N. Onwubiko

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The Nigerian civil war and Biafra's failed attempt to secede from Nigeria raised a series of questions about the nature and scope of the right to self-determination in formerly colonised states. The question which this article focuses on is whether the right to self-determination should always amount to a right to secession. Through a critical analysis of Biafran agitations for statehood during the Nigerian civil war and in recent times, this article makes the case for a framework through which self-determination claims can be addressed within existing territorial arrangements. The article argues that, in the case of Biafra, forms of internal self-determination such as autonomy may address the agitations and needs of the people better than secession. Hence, international lawyers, and the international community as a whole, should give more attention to internal forms of self-determination.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Nigerian civil war and Biafra's failed attempt to secede from Nigeria raised a series of questions about the nature and scope of the right to self-determination in formerly colonised states. The question which this article focuses on is whether the right to self-determination should always amount to a right to secession. Through a critical analysis of Biafran agitations for statehood during the Nigerian civil war and in recent times, this article makes the case for a framework through which self-determination claims can be addressed within existing territorial arrangements. The article argues that, in the case of Biafra, forms of internal self-determination such as autonomy may address the agitations and needs of the people better than secession. Hence, international lawyers, and the international community as a whole, should give more attention to internal forms of self-determination.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Nigerian civil war and Biafra's failed attempt to secede from Nigeria raised a series of questions about the nature and scope of the right to self-determination in formerly colonised states. The question which this article focuses on is whether the right to self-determination should always amount to a right to secession. Through a critical analysis of Biafran agitations for statehood during the Nigerian civil war and in recent times, this article makes the case for a framework through which self-determination claims can be addressed within existing territorial arrangements. The article argues that, in the case of Biafra, forms of internal self-determination such as autonomy may address the agitations and needs of the people better than secession. Hence, international lawyers, and the international community as a whole, should give more attention to internal forms of self-determination.

Key concepts: Secession, Self-determination, Autonomy, Scope (computer science), Spanish Civil War, Political science, International community, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Biafran Self-Determination Question: Challenges and Prospects — Research Paper | ScholarLens