State Immunity, Political Accountability, and Alden v. Maine
William P. Marshall, Jason S. Cowart
Abstract
Open-access reader
William P. Marshall, Jason S. Cowart
Abstract
Open-access reader
In Alden v. Maine,' the United States Supreme Court ruled that Congress could not subject nonconsenting states to private suits for money damages in state court.The case closely followed the Court's decision three years earlier in Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 2 which held that Congress could not subject nonconsenting states to private suits for money damages in federal court.The two cases together thus virtually immunize the states from private suits for damages based upon federal statutory law.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In Alden v. Maine,' the United States Supreme Court ruled that Congress could not subject nonconsenting states to private suits for money damages in state court.The case closely followed the Court's decision three years earlier in Seminole Tribe v. Florida, 2 which held that Congress could not subject nonconsenting states to private suits for money damages in federal court.The two cases together thus virtually immunize the states from private suits for damages based upon federal statutory law.
Key concepts: Accountability, Law, State (computer science), Political science, Politics, Sovereign immunity, Mathematics, Constitution