2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Interpreting Constitutive Instruments Of International Criminal Tribunals: Reflections On The Special Court For Sierra Leone

Phoebe Okowa

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

In 2000, the United Nations (UN) entered into a bilateral agreement with the government of Sierra Leone, which established a Special Court to try those responsible for the most serious atrocities committed during the Sierra Leone conflict. The competence of the UN to enter into the agreement of this kind, although unprecedented, was not in doubt, the UN having characterised the situation in Sierra Leone as constituting a threat to international peace and security, it was conceivably free to determine what it regarded as an appropriate response in the exercise of its powers under the Charter, including the establishment of an international criminal tribunal. This chapter focuses on legal questions generated by the treaty basis of the Special Court in light of the law of treaties and the recent jurisprudence of the tribunal. Keywords: international criminal tribunal; Security Council; Sierra Leone; Special Court; United Nations (UN)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In 2000, the United Nations (UN) entered into a bilateral agreement with the government of Sierra Leone, which established a Special Court to try those responsible for the most serious atrocities committed during the Sierra Leone conflict. The competence of the UN to enter into the agreement of this kind, although unprecedented, was not in doubt, the UN having characterised the situation in Sierra Leone as constituting a threat to international peace and security, it was conceivably free to determine what it regarded as an appropriate response in the exercise of its powers under the Charter, including the establishment of an international criminal tribunal. This chapter focuses on legal questions generated by the treaty basis of the Special Court in light of the law of treaties and the recent jurisprudence of the tribunal. Keywords: international criminal tribunal; Security Council; Sierra Leone; Special Court; United Nations (UN)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In 2000, the United Nations (UN) entered into a bilateral agreement with the government of Sierra Leone, which established a Special Court to try those responsible for the most serious atrocities committed during the Sierra Leone conflict. The competence of the UN to enter into the agreement of this kind, although unprecedented, was not in doubt, the UN having characterised the situation in Sierra Leone as constituting a threat to international peace and security, it was conceivably free to determine what it regarded as an appropriate response in the exercise of its powers under the Charter, including the establishment of an international criminal tribunal. This chapter focuses on legal questions generated by the treaty basis of the Special Court in light of the law of treaties and the recent jurisprudence of the tribunal. Keywords: international criminal tribunal; Security Council; Sierra Leone; Special Court; United Nations (UN)

Key concepts: Sierra leone, Special court, Law, Criminal court, Criminology, Political science, Sociology, International law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Interpreting Constitutive Instruments Of International Criminal Tribunals: Reflections On The Special Court For Sierra Leone — Research Paper | ScholarLens