2009•Contributions to economicsRequires access

Non-Tobin’s q in Tests for Financial Constraints to Investment

Sílvio Rendón

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Liquidity constrained firms may be under two very well identified investment regimes, constrained and unconstrained. In this paper I derive theoretical investment equations for both regimes and discuss the consequences of ignoring the specific form of the liquidity constrained regime. I also show that expressing the investment equation as a function of Tobin’s q is by no means necessary in theory and in practice, in particular, it is not required to test for liquidity constraints. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Liquidity constrained firms may be under two very well identified investment regimes, constrained and unconstrained. In this paper I derive theoretical investment equations for both regimes and discuss the consequences of ignoring the specific form of the liquidity constrained regime. I also show that expressing the investment equation as a function of Tobin’s q is by no means necessary in theory and in practice, in particular, it is not required to test for liquidity constraints. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Liquidity constrained firms may be under two very well identified investment regimes, constrained and unconstrained. In this paper I derive theoretical investment equations for both regimes and discuss the consequences of ignoring the specific form of the liquidity constrained regime. I also show that expressing the investment equation as a function of Tobin’s q is by no means necessary in theory and in practice, in particular, it is not required to test for liquidity constraints. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Tobin's q, Investment (military), Economics, Finance, Monetary economics, Business, Mathematics, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Non-Tobin’s q in Tests for Financial Constraints to Investment — Research Paper | ScholarLens