Non-Tobin’s q in Tests for Financial Constraints to Investment
Sílvio Rendón
Abstract
Sílvio Rendón
Abstract
Liquidity constrained firms may be under two very well identified investment regimes, constrained and unconstrained. In this paper I derive theoretical investment equations for both regimes and discuss the consequences of ignoring the specific form of the liquidity constrained regime. I also show that expressing the investment equation as a function of Tobin’s q is by no means necessary in theory and in practice, in particular, it is not required to test for liquidity constraints. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Liquidity constrained firms may be under two very well identified investment regimes, constrained and unconstrained. In this paper I derive theoretical investment equations for both regimes and discuss the consequences of ignoring the specific form of the liquidity constrained regime. I also show that expressing the investment equation as a function of Tobin’s q is by no means necessary in theory and in practice, in particular, it is not required to test for liquidity constraints. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Key concepts: Tobin's q, Investment (military), Economics, Finance, Monetary economics, Business, Mathematics, Political science