1978Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

EVALUATION OF ROAD AND TRANSIT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTERNATIVE URBAN FORMS

R G Rice

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Research was performed for the purpose of evaluating the road and transit system requirements of a range of cities that have different density and spatial patterns and thereby assessing the effects of varying urban forms on transportation investment and service measures. The assessment is conducted in the context of a proposed policy evaluation framework that uses the end-state transportation and land-use plan for policy guidance and the time stream of benefits and costs as the object of evalaution. For the analysis of the transportation implications of a number of urban forms, a two-mode network generation model is developed and applied to six hypothetical city types of 2 million population. The comparison of the transportation requirements for these urban forms indicates a range of transit use among the city types of from 8 to 24 percent and wide differences in the need for high-capacity service routes. In terms of person hours of travel and mean trip length, the multicentered city in particular and the centrally oriented cities in general have the lowest requirements. These conclusions have important implications for the use of horizon-year transportation and land-use plans within the proposed framework of dynamic evaluation. /Author/

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Research was performed for the purpose of evaluating the road and transit system requirements of a range of cities that have different density and spatial patterns and thereby assessing the effects of varying urban forms on transportation investment and service measures. The assessment is conducted in the context of a proposed policy evaluation framework that uses the end-state transportation and land-use plan for policy guidance and the time stream of benefits and costs as the object of evalaution. For the analysis of the transportation implications of a number of urban forms, a two-mode network generation model is developed and applied to six hypothetical city types of 2 million population. The comparison of the transportation requirements for these urban forms indicates a range of transit use among the city types of from 8 to 24 percent and wide differences in the need for high-capacity service routes. In terms of person hours of travel and mean trip length, the multicentered city in particular and the centrally oriented cities in general have the lowest requirements. These conclusions have important implications for the use of horizon-year transportation and land-use plans within the proposed framework of dynamic evaluation. /Author/

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Research was performed for the purpose of evaluating the road and transit system requirements of a range of cities that have different density and spatial patterns and thereby assessing the effects of varying urban forms on transportation investment and service measures. The assessment is conducted in the context of a proposed policy evaluation framework that uses the end-state transportation and land-use plan for policy guidance and the time stream of benefits and costs as the object of evalaution. For the analysis of the transportation implications of a number of urban forms, a two-mode network generation model is developed and applied to six hypothetical city types of 2 million population. The comparison of the transportation requirements for these urban forms indicates a range of transit use among the city types of from 8 to 24 percent and wide differences in the need for high-capacity service routes. In terms of person hours of travel and mean trip length, the multicentered city in particular and the centrally oriented cities in general have the lowest requirements. These conclusions have important implications for the use of horizon-year transportation and land-use plans within the proposed framework of dynamic evaluation. /Author/

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Context (archaeology), Land use, Level of service, Plan (archaeology), Service (business), Investment (military), Transportation planning

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EVALUATION OF ROAD AND TRANSIT SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS FOR ALTERNATIVE URBAN FORMS — Research Paper | ScholarLens