1996Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa)Open access

The role of deterrence and retribution in sentencing in South African courts

David Ntshangase

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The role of Deterrence and Retribution in sentencing in South \nAfrican Courts \nSince the early history of the existence of humanity punishment \nhas been meted out to transgressors of the laws of society. \nInformal sanctions, including ostracism are imposed by members of \nsociety for social transgressions. Formal punishment is imposed \nby courts through a system of criminal justice. \nThis dissertation deals with the concept of punishment. It \nconsiders the significance of the theories of punishment in the \nsentencing process with particular reference to deterrence and \nretribution, the philosophical rationale for their use and thus \ntheir role in sentencing. \nIn this study the historical evolution of retribution is traced \nand the recognition accorded particularly to retribution and \ndeterrence as well as reformation and prevention as penal \nobjectives at various periods in history is examined. \nCase law has been cited to determine their recognition by \njudicial practice in criminal courts. \nThe study also reflects on the criminal justice system's clients' \nperceptions on sentencing.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The role of Deterrence and Retribution in sentencing in South \nAfrican Courts \nSince the early history of the existence of humanity punishment \nhas been meted out to transgressors of the laws of society. \nInformal sanctions, including ostracism are imposed by members of \nsociety for social transgressions. Formal punishment is imposed \nby courts through a system of criminal justice. \nThis dissertation deals with the concept of punishment. It \nconsiders the significance of the theories of punishment in the \nsentencing process with particular reference to deterrence and \nretribution, the philosophical rationale for their use and thus \ntheir role in sentencing. \nIn this study the historical evolution of retribution is traced \nand the recognition accorded particularly to retribution and \ndeterrence as well as reformation and prevention as penal \nobjectives at various periods in history is examined. \nCase law has been cited to determine their recognition by \njudicial practice in criminal courts. \nThe study also reflects on the criminal justice system's clients' \nperceptions on sentencing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The role of Deterrence and Retribution in sentencing in South \nAfrican Courts \nSince the early history of the existence of humanity punishment \nhas been meted out to transgressors of the laws of society. \nInformal sanctions, including ostracism are imposed by members of \nsociety for social transgressions. Formal punishment is imposed \nby courts through a system of criminal justice. \nThis dissertation deals with the concept of punishment. It \nconsiders the significance of the theories of punishment in the \nsentencing process with particular reference to deterrence and \nretribution, the philosophical rationale for their use and thus \ntheir role in sentencing. \nIn this study the historical evolution of retribution is traced \nand the recognition accorded particularly to retribution and \ndeterrence as well as reformation and prevention as penal \nobjectives at various periods in history is examined. \nCase law has been cited to determine their recognition by \njudicial practice in criminal courts. \nThe study also reflects on the criminal justice system's clients' \nperceptions on sentencing.

Key concepts: Deterrence (psychology), Retributive justice, Criminology, Political science, Law, Psychology, Economic Justice

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The role of deterrence and retribution in sentencing in South African courts — Research Paper | ScholarLens