2011Policy Press eBooksRequires access

Courts, punishment and sentencing

David Faulkner, Ros Burnett

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the roles of the courts and the criminal law. It reflects on the nature of punishment and changing attitudes towards its use, and on the structure and purpose of sentencing. The chapter argues against an excessive reliance on criminal penalties and the arm of the law as the principal means of reducing crime; and it proposes the establishment of a clearer criteria for determining which actions and situations should be defined as new offences and for reviewing which current offences should continue to be defined as such. It also argues that legislation on sentencing should be simplified and indeterminate, and that mandatory sentences abolished as far as possible. The chapter continues with a section on the position of victims and witnesses, and concludes with a discussion on the role of restorative justice and the scope for its development.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter focuses on the roles of the courts and the criminal law. It reflects on the nature of punishment and changing attitudes towards its use, and on the structure and purpose of sentencing. The chapter argues against an excessive reliance on criminal penalties and the arm of the law as the principal means of reducing crime; and it proposes the establishment of a clearer criteria for determining which actions and situations should be defined as new offences and for reviewing which current offences should continue to be defined as such. It also argues that legislation on sentencing should be simplified and indeterminate, and that mandatory sentences abolished as far as possible. The chapter continues with a section on the position of victims and witnesses, and concludes with a discussion on the role of restorative justice and the scope for its development.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter focuses on the roles of the courts and the criminal law. It reflects on the nature of punishment and changing attitudes towards its use, and on the structure and purpose of sentencing. The chapter argues against an excessive reliance on criminal penalties and the arm of the law as the principal means of reducing crime; and it proposes the establishment of a clearer criteria for determining which actions and situations should be defined as new offences and for reviewing which current offences should continue to be defined as such. It also argues that legislation on sentencing should be simplified and indeterminate, and that mandatory sentences abolished as far as possible. The chapter continues with a section on the position of victims and witnesses, and concludes with a discussion on the role of restorative justice and the scope for its development.

Key concepts: Criminology, Punishment (psychology), Political science, Sentencing guidelines, Psychology, Law, Social psychology, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Courts, punishment and sentencing — Research Paper | ScholarLens