2014•Unpublished venueRequires access

Epilogue. The Mongol Empire after Genghis Khan

Denise Aigle

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter provides concluding remarks for this book The Mongol Empire between Myth and Reality: Studies in Anthropological History, which discusses the Mongol empire. The pro-Mongol Muslim sources depict Genghis Khan the tool of God and partly monotheize the myths of his origin. The fragmentation of the Mongol empire was not the end of an era: Genghiskhanid legitimacy continued to influence rulers in their ideological choices. After the collapse of the Mongol khanates, the Mongol ideology remained vigorous and the charisma of Genghis Khan was still so strong that only his descendants could legally use the sovereign titles: khan and khaghan. Descent from Genghis Khan remained an important political factor, as was Central Asia's identity an Islamic society. Timur's career was founded upon both Mongol influence and models of Islamic and sacred kingship.Keywords: Central Asia; Genghis Khan; Islamic society; Mongol Empire; Timur

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter provides concluding remarks for this book The Mongol Empire between Myth and Reality: Studies in Anthropological History, which discusses the Mongol empire. The pro-Mongol Muslim sources depict Genghis Khan the tool of God and partly monotheize the myths of his origin. The fragmentation of the Mongol empire was not the end of an era: Genghiskhanid legitimacy continued to influence rulers in their ideological choices. After the collapse of the Mongol khanates, the Mongol ideology remained vigorous and the charisma of Genghis Khan was still so strong that only his descendants could legally use the sovereign titles: khan and khaghan. Descent from Genghis Khan remained an important political factor, as was Central Asia's identity an Islamic society. Timur's career was founded upon both Mongol influence and models of Islamic and sacred kingship.Keywords: Central Asia; Genghis Khan; Islamic society; Mongol Empire; Timur

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter provides concluding remarks for this book The Mongol Empire between Myth and Reality: Studies in Anthropological History, which discusses the Mongol empire. The pro-Mongol Muslim sources depict Genghis Khan the tool of God and partly monotheize the myths of his origin. The fragmentation of the Mongol empire was not the end of an era: Genghiskhanid legitimacy continued to influence rulers in their ideological choices. After the collapse of the Mongol khanates, the Mongol ideology remained vigorous and the charisma of Genghis Khan was still so strong that only his descendants could legally use the sovereign titles: khan and khaghan. Descent from Genghis Khan remained an important political factor, as was Central Asia's identity an Islamic society. Timur's career was founded upon both Mongol influence and models of Islamic and sacred kingship.Keywords: Central Asia; Genghis Khan; Islamic society; Mongol Empire; Timur

Key concepts: Empire, Islam, Ancient history, Legitimacy, Ideology, Monarchy, Mythology, History

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Epilogue. The Mongol Empire after Genghis Khan — Research Paper | ScholarLens