2008Journal of the Korean Society of Physical MedicineRequires access

The Comparison of Trunk Repositioning Errors in Individuals with and without Low Back Pain at Different Postures

Goon-Chang Yuk, Jin-Tae Han, Hyunsuk Shin, Ho-Geon Lee, Rea-Joon Park

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare trunk repositioning errors between subjects with and without low back pain in sitting and standing. Methods : Total 81 participants were recruited who consisted of 41 subjects with low back pain and 40 normal subjects. The subjects were instructed to replicate the predetermined target positions of the trunk toward upright and flexion in sitting and standing. During each of movement, digital inclinometer was used to measure the angular movement of spinal process. Repositioning error was calculated as the absolute difference between the predetermined target positions and replicated target positions. Results : In subjects with low back pain, upright repositioning error was in sitting and in standing, and flexion repositioning error was in sitting and in standing. In subjects without low back pain, upright repositioning error was in sitting and in standing, and flexion repositioning error was in sitting and in standing. It was demonstrated that flexion repositioning error increased significantly in standing position. In subjects with low back pain, flexion repositioning error was significantly higher in standing than in sitting. Conclusion : The repositioning error of subjects with low back pain increased during flexion and it implies that some aspects of proprioception are decreased in subjects with low back pain. Therefore, it will be emphasis that a clinical trial to increase the trunk flexion stability of subjects with low back pain in standing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare trunk repositioning errors between subjects with and without low back pain in sitting and standing. Methods : Total 81 participants were recruited who consisted of 41 subjects with low back pain and 40 normal subjects. The subjects were instructed to replicate the predetermined target positions of the trunk toward upright and flexion in sitting and standing. During each of movement, digital inclinometer was used to measure the angular movement of spinal process. Repositioning error was calculated as the absolute difference between the predetermined target positions and replicated target positions. Results : In subjects with low back pain, upright repositioning error was in sitting and in standing, and flexion repositioning error was in sitting and in standing. In subjects without low back pain, upright repositioning error was in sitting and in standing, and flexion repositioning error was in sitting and in standing. It was demonstrated that flexion repositioning error increased significantly in standing position. In subjects with low back pain, flexion repositioning error was significantly higher in standing than in sitting. Conclusion : The repositioning error of subjects with low back pain increased during flexion and it implies that some aspects of proprioception are decreased in subjects with low back pain. Therefore, it will be emphasis that a clinical trial to increase the trunk flexion stability of subjects with low back pain in standing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to compare trunk repositioning errors between subjects with and without low back pain in sitting and standing. Methods : Total 81 participants were recruited who consisted of 41 subjects with low back pain and 40 normal subjects. The subjects were instructed to replicate the predetermined target positions of the trunk toward upright and flexion in sitting and standing. During each of movement, digital inclinometer was used to measure the angular movement of spinal process. Repositioning error was calculated as the absolute difference between the predetermined target positions and replicated target positions. Results : In subjects with low back pain, upright repositioning error was in sitting and in standing, and flexion repositioning error was in sitting and in standing. In subjects without low back pain, upright repositioning error was in sitting and in standing, and flexion repositioning error was in sitting and in standing. It was demonstrated that flexion repositioning error increased significantly in standing position. In subjects with low back pain, flexion repositioning error was significantly higher in standing than in sitting. Conclusion : The repositioning error of subjects with low back pain increased during flexion and it implies that some aspects of proprioception are decreased in subjects with low back pain. Therefore, it will be emphasis that a clinical trial to increase the trunk flexion stability of subjects with low back pain in standing.

Key concepts: Sitting, Low back pain, Trunk, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Medicine, Physical therapy, Back pain, Proprioception

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Comparison of Trunk Repositioning Errors in Individuals with and without Low Back Pain at Different Postures — Research Paper | ScholarLens