2019European Journal of PhysiotherapyRequires access

No differences in spinal repositioning error in patients with low back pain presenting with a directional preference into extension

Vasileios Korakakis, Kieran O’Sullivan, Vasileios Sideris, Giannis Giakas

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Aim: To compare repositioning error, habitual and self-perceived optimal sitting posture, between patients with low back pain presenting with a directional preference into extension and asymptomatic individuals.Method: Fifteen patients with low back pain were matched with 15 asymptomatic individuals. Lumbo-pelvic repositioning error, pain, functional disability, and depression were evaluated. Participants reproduced two target positions (neutral and lordotic sitting postures) after slump sitting.Results: No significant differences (all p > .05) were detected between patients with low back pain and asymptomatic individuals in error direction, magnitude and variability. Furthermore, no differences were found in habitual or self-perceived optimal posture between the patients and control groups.Conclusions: We found no evidence of deficits in proprioception in patients with mild low back pain and directional preference into extension. While the lack of clear deficits in repositioning error is consistent with many previous studies, there are also data suggesting deficits in repositioning error among patients with low back pain. Variations in methodology, the population of patients studied, and especially their level of pain, could explain this variation. The lack of consistent deficits in repositioning error suggests other factors, across the biopsychosocial spectrum, may be more relevant in the development, and persistence, of low back pain.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Aim: To compare repositioning error, habitual and self-perceived optimal sitting posture, between patients with low back pain presenting with a directional preference into extension and asymptomatic individuals.Method: Fifteen patients with low back pain were matched with 15 asymptomatic individuals. Lumbo-pelvic repositioning error, pain, functional disability, and depression were evaluated. Participants reproduced two target positions (neutral and lordotic sitting postures) after slump sitting.Results: No significant differences (all p > .05) were detected between patients with low back pain and asymptomatic individuals in error direction, magnitude and variability. Furthermore, no differences were found in habitual or self-perceived optimal posture between the patients and control groups.Conclusions: We found no evidence of deficits in proprioception in patients with mild low back pain and directional preference into extension. While the lack of clear deficits in repositioning error is consistent with many previous studies, there are also data suggesting deficits in repositioning error among patients with low back pain. Variations in methodology, the population of patients studied, and especially their level of pain, could explain this variation. The lack of consistent deficits in repositioning error suggests other factors, across the biopsychosocial spectrum, may be more relevant in the development, and persistence, of low back pain.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Aim: To compare repositioning error, habitual and self-perceived optimal sitting posture, between patients with low back pain presenting with a directional preference into extension and asymptomatic individuals.Method: Fifteen patients with low back pain were matched with 15 asymptomatic individuals. Lumbo-pelvic repositioning error, pain, functional disability, and depression were evaluated. Participants reproduced two target positions (neutral and lordotic sitting postures) after slump sitting.Results: No significant differences (all p > .05) were detected between patients with low back pain and asymptomatic individuals in error direction, magnitude and variability. Furthermore, no differences were found in habitual or self-perceived optimal posture between the patients and control groups.Conclusions: We found no evidence of deficits in proprioception in patients with mild low back pain and directional preference into extension. While the lack of clear deficits in repositioning error is consistent with many previous studies, there are also data suggesting deficits in repositioning error among patients with low back pain. Variations in methodology, the population of patients studied, and especially their level of pain, could explain this variation. The lack of consistent deficits in repositioning error suggests other factors, across the biopsychosocial spectrum, may be more relevant in the development, and persistence, of low back pain.

Key concepts: Asymptomatic, Low back pain, Medicine, Sitting, Physical therapy, Physical medicine and rehabilitation, Biopsychosocial model, Back pain

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
No differences in spinal repositioning error in patients with low back pain presenting with a directional preference into extension — Research Paper | ScholarLens