2007Unpublished venueRequires access

Development of a Regional Pavement Performance Database for the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: Part 1: Sensitivity Analysis

Swetha Kesiraju, Hussain U. Bahia

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Optimization of transportation facilities for capacity and pavement condition could be achieved with mechanistic analysis of pavement structures. This report is focused on using the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) M-E Design Guide (MEPDG) to show the results of quantitative sensitivity analyses of typical pavement structures (rigid and flexible pavements) to highlight the main factors that affect pavement performance in terms of critical distresses and smoothness. The sensitivity analyses were conducted using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide software (version 8.1). Pavement performance included specifically faulting, transverse cracking, and smoothness for rigid pavements. It also included smoothness, longitudinal cracking, alligator cracking, transverse cracking, and permanent deformation for flexible pavements. The input parameters that were varied included traffic variables [Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic (AADTT), speed, and wander] and pavement structure for selected rigid and flexible pavements. In addition, the binder grade was varied for the flexible pavements. Based on the sensitivity results, the input parameters were ranked and categorized from those to which pavement performance is most sensitive to least sensitive (or insensitive). The ranking should help pavement designers identify the level of importance for each input parameter and also identify the input parameters that can be modified to satisfy the predetermined pavement performance criteria. It is expected that ranking could also help planners to determine how traffic of heavy vehicles could be directed to enhance the service life of various sections of pavement network and to develop better maintenance strategies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Optimization of transportation facilities for capacity and pavement condition could be achieved with mechanistic analysis of pavement structures. This report is focused on using the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) M-E Design Guide (MEPDG) to show the results of quantitative sensitivity analyses of typical pavement structures (rigid and flexible pavements) to highlight the main factors that affect pavement performance in terms of critical distresses and smoothness. The sensitivity analyses were conducted using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide software (version 8.1). Pavement performance included specifically faulting, transverse cracking, and smoothness for rigid pavements. It also included smoothness, longitudinal cracking, alligator cracking, transverse cracking, and permanent deformation for flexible pavements. The input parameters that were varied included traffic variables [Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic (AADTT), speed, and wander] and pavement structure for selected rigid and flexible pavements. In addition, the binder grade was varied for the flexible pavements. Based on the sensitivity results, the input parameters were ranked and categorized from those to which pavement performance is most sensitive to least sensitive (or insensitive). The ranking should help pavement designers identify the level of importance for each input parameter and also identify the input parameters that can be modified to satisfy the predetermined pavement performance criteria. It is expected that ranking could also help planners to determine how traffic of heavy vehicles could be directed to enhance the service life of various sections of pavement network and to develop better maintenance strategies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Optimization of transportation facilities for capacity and pavement condition could be achieved with mechanistic analysis of pavement structures. This report is focused on using the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) M-E Design Guide (MEPDG) to show the results of quantitative sensitivity analyses of typical pavement structures (rigid and flexible pavements) to highlight the main factors that affect pavement performance in terms of critical distresses and smoothness. The sensitivity analyses were conducted using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide software (version 8.1). Pavement performance included specifically faulting, transverse cracking, and smoothness for rigid pavements. It also included smoothness, longitudinal cracking, alligator cracking, transverse cracking, and permanent deformation for flexible pavements. The input parameters that were varied included traffic variables [Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic (AADTT), speed, and wander] and pavement structure for selected rigid and flexible pavements. In addition, the binder grade was varied for the flexible pavements. Based on the sensitivity results, the input parameters were ranked and categorized from those to which pavement performance is most sensitive to least sensitive (or insensitive). The ranking should help pavement designers identify the level of importance for each input parameter and also identify the input parameters that can be modified to satisfy the predetermined pavement performance criteria. It is expected that ranking could also help planners to determine how traffic of heavy vehicles could be directed to enhance the service life of various sections of pavement network and to develop better maintenance strategies.

Key concepts: Smoothness, Truck, Sensitivity (control systems), Pavement engineering, Ranking (information retrieval), Engineering, Cracking, Rut

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Development of a Regional Pavement Performance Database for the AASHTO Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide: Part 1: Sensitivity Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens