2005Unpublished venueRequires access

Sensitivity Analysis of Rigid Pavement Systems Using Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Design Guide

Alper Guclu, Hali̇l Ceylan

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Pavement design procedures available in the literature do not fully take advantage of mechanistic design concepts, and as a result, heavily rely on empirical approaches. Because of their heavy dependence on empirical procedures, the existing rigid pavement design methodologies do not capture the actual behavior of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements. However, reliance on empirical solutions can be reduced by introducing mechanistic-empirical methods, now adopted in the newly released Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). This new design procedure incorporates a wide range of input parameters associated with the mechanics of rigid pavements. A study was undertaken to compare the sensitivity of these various input parameters on the performance of concrete pavements. Two Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (JPCP) sites were selected in Iowa. These two sections are also part of the Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program, where a long history of pavement performance data exists. Data obtained from the Iowa Department of Transportation (Iowa DOT) Pavement Management Information System (PMIS) and LTPP database were used to form two standard pavement sections for the comprehensive sensitivity analyses. The sensitivity analyses were conducted using the MEPDG software to study the effects of design input parameters on pavement performance, specifically faulting, transverse cracking, and smoothness. Based on the sensitivity results, the rigid pavement input parameters were ranked and categorized from most sensitive to insensitive to help pavement design engineers to identify the level of importance for each input parameter. The curl/warp effective temperature difference (built-in curling and warping of the slabs) and PCC thermal properties are found to be the most sensitive input parameters. Based on the comprehensive sensitivity analyses, the idea of developing an expert system is introduced to help the designer identify the input parameters that can be modified to satisfy the predetermined pavement performance criteria.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Pavement design procedures available in the literature do not fully take advantage of mechanistic design concepts, and as a result, heavily rely on empirical approaches. Because of their heavy dependence on empirical procedures, the existing rigid pavement design methodologies do not capture the actual behavior of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements. However, reliance on empirical solutions can be reduced by introducing mechanistic-empirical methods, now adopted in the newly released Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). This new design procedure incorporates a wide range of input parameters associated with the mechanics of rigid pavements. A study was undertaken to compare the sensitivity of these various input parameters on the performance of concrete pavements. Two Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (JPCP) sites were selected in Iowa. These two sections are also part of the Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program, where a long history of pavement performance data exists. Data obtained from the Iowa Department of Transportation (Iowa DOT) Pavement Management Information System (PMIS) and LTPP database were used to form two standard pavement sections for the comprehensive sensitivity analyses. The sensitivity analyses were conducted using the MEPDG software to study the effects of design input parameters on pavement performance, specifically faulting, transverse cracking, and smoothness. Based on the sensitivity results, the rigid pavement input parameters were ranked and categorized from most sensitive to insensitive to help pavement design engineers to identify the level of importance for each input parameter. The curl/warp effective temperature difference (built-in curling and warping of the slabs) and PCC thermal properties are found to be the most sensitive input parameters. Based on the comprehensive sensitivity analyses, the idea of developing an expert system is introduced to help the designer identify the input parameters that can be modified to satisfy the predetermined pavement performance criteria.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Pavement design procedures available in the literature do not fully take advantage of mechanistic design concepts, and as a result, heavily rely on empirical approaches. Because of their heavy dependence on empirical procedures, the existing rigid pavement design methodologies do not capture the actual behavior of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements. However, reliance on empirical solutions can be reduced by introducing mechanistic-empirical methods, now adopted in the newly released Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG). This new design procedure incorporates a wide range of input parameters associated with the mechanics of rigid pavements. A study was undertaken to compare the sensitivity of these various input parameters on the performance of concrete pavements. Two Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement (JPCP) sites were selected in Iowa. These two sections are also part of the Long Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) program, where a long history of pavement performance data exists. Data obtained from the Iowa Department of Transportation (Iowa DOT) Pavement Management Information System (PMIS) and LTPP database were used to form two standard pavement sections for the comprehensive sensitivity analyses. The sensitivity analyses were conducted using the MEPDG software to study the effects of design input parameters on pavement performance, specifically faulting, transverse cracking, and smoothness. Based on the sensitivity results, the rigid pavement input parameters were ranked and categorized from most sensitive to insensitive to help pavement design engineers to identify the level of importance for each input parameter. The curl/warp effective temperature difference (built-in curling and warping of the slabs) and PCC thermal properties are found to be the most sensitive input parameters. Based on the comprehensive sensitivity analyses, the idea of developing an expert system is introduced to help the designer identify the input parameters that can be modified to satisfy the predetermined pavement performance criteria.

Key concepts: Pavement engineering, Pavement management, Sensitivity (control systems), Engineering, Curling, Types of concrete, Fatigue cracking, Structural engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sensitivity Analysis of Rigid Pavement Systems Using Mechanistic- Empirical Pavement Design Guide — Research Paper | ScholarLens