2003PROCEEDINGS OF 18TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL CONFERENCE ON THE ENHANCED SAFETY OF VEHICLES, HELD NAGOYA, JAPAN, 19-22 MAY 2003Requires access

PERSPECTIVES ON VEHICLE CRASH COMPATIBILITY AND RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER SAFETY CRITERIA

Mukul Verma, Joseph P. Lavelle, Robert Lange

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

A study of accident data for vehicle-to-vehicle collisions shows that for injuries of AIS equal to or greater than 3, significant portions of vehicles' front structures are involved in the crash, both in frontal and in side impacts. Analysis presented here also shows that most of the LTV-to-car crashes are side impacts and that these side impacts account for 57 percent of the total harm associated with LTV-to-car crashes. These frontal and side impacts between LTVs and cars are further divided by the location and the direction of impact. It has been shown earlier that the use of fixed barriers as test devices for crashworthiness is likely to lead to front structures of larger vehicles being designed for higher force levels than the front structures of smaller vehicles, the overall effect being decreased crash compatibility between vehicles. The effect of the side impact barrier, used for compliance with dynamic FMVSS 214, as shown by updated data, is again observed to be improved compatibility between vehicles of different sizes. For the covering abstract see ITRD E825082.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A study of accident data for vehicle-to-vehicle collisions shows that for injuries of AIS equal to or greater than 3, significant portions of vehicles' front structures are involved in the crash, both in frontal and in side impacts. Analysis presented here also shows that most of the LTV-to-car crashes are side impacts and that these side impacts account for 57 percent of the total harm associated with LTV-to-car crashes. These frontal and side impacts between LTVs and cars are further divided by the location and the direction of impact. It has been shown earlier that the use of fixed barriers as test devices for crashworthiness is likely to lead to front structures of larger vehicles being designed for higher force levels than the front structures of smaller vehicles, the overall effect being decreased crash compatibility between vehicles. The effect of the side impact barrier, used for compliance with dynamic FMVSS 214, as shown by updated data, is again observed to be improved compatibility between vehicles of different sizes. For the covering abstract see ITRD E825082.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A study of accident data for vehicle-to-vehicle collisions shows that for injuries of AIS equal to or greater than 3, significant portions of vehicles' front structures are involved in the crash, both in frontal and in side impacts. Analysis presented here also shows that most of the LTV-to-car crashes are side impacts and that these side impacts account for 57 percent of the total harm associated with LTV-to-car crashes. These frontal and side impacts between LTVs and cars are further divided by the location and the direction of impact. It has been shown earlier that the use of fixed barriers as test devices for crashworthiness is likely to lead to front structures of larger vehicles being designed for higher force levels than the front structures of smaller vehicles, the overall effect being decreased crash compatibility between vehicles. The effect of the side impact barrier, used for compliance with dynamic FMVSS 214, as shown by updated data, is again observed to be improved compatibility between vehicles of different sizes. For the covering abstract see ITRD E825082.

Key concepts: Side impact, Crashworthiness, Crash, Vehicle safety, Engineering, Compatibility (geochemistry), Automotive engineering, Poison control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PERSPECTIVES ON VEHICLE CRASH COMPATIBILITY AND RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER SAFETY CRITERIA — Research Paper | ScholarLens