1995ITE journalRequires access

EUROPEAN PRACTICES AND INNOVATIONS FOR PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS

Carol Tan, Charles V. Zegeer

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

A wide variety of practices are used in Great Britain, Germany, and the Netherlands to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility at street crossings. This article examines the suitability of these practices for transfer to the United States. The Federal Highway Administration sponsored a pedestrian and bicycle research scanning trip to the three European countries mentioned above. Great Britain employs mostly curb ramps with some type of tactile warning devices. The Dutch concentrate on bicycle facilities and traffic-calming strategies as a whole, rather than pedestrian accommodations. And likewise in Germany, the focus is on implementing areawide traffic calming strategies, not specific pedestrian treatments. Disincentives for motor vehicles, education, and law enforcement are discusssed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A wide variety of practices are used in Great Britain, Germany, and the Netherlands to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility at street crossings. This article examines the suitability of these practices for transfer to the United States. The Federal Highway Administration sponsored a pedestrian and bicycle research scanning trip to the three European countries mentioned above. Great Britain employs mostly curb ramps with some type of tactile warning devices. The Dutch concentrate on bicycle facilities and traffic-calming strategies as a whole, rather than pedestrian accommodations. And likewise in Germany, the focus is on implementing areawide traffic calming strategies, not specific pedestrian treatments. Disincentives for motor vehicles, education, and law enforcement are discusssed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A wide variety of practices are used in Great Britain, Germany, and the Netherlands to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility at street crossings. This article examines the suitability of these practices for transfer to the United States. The Federal Highway Administration sponsored a pedestrian and bicycle research scanning trip to the three European countries mentioned above. Great Britain employs mostly curb ramps with some type of tactile warning devices. The Dutch concentrate on bicycle facilities and traffic-calming strategies as a whole, rather than pedestrian accommodations. And likewise in Germany, the focus is on implementing areawide traffic calming strategies, not specific pedestrian treatments. Disincentives for motor vehicles, education, and law enforcement are discusssed.

Key concepts: Pedestrian, Traffic calming, Law enforcement, Transport engineering, Enforcement, Variety (cybernetics), Administration (probate law), Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EUROPEAN PRACTICES AND INNOVATIONS FOR PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS — Research Paper | ScholarLens