EUROPEAN PRACTICES AND INNOVATIONS FOR PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS
Carol Tan, Charles V. Zegeer
Abstract
Carol Tan, Charles V. Zegeer
Abstract
A wide variety of practices are used in Great Britain, Germany, and the Netherlands to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility at street crossings. This article examines the suitability of these practices for transfer to the United States. The Federal Highway Administration sponsored a pedestrian and bicycle research scanning trip to the three European countries mentioned above. Great Britain employs mostly curb ramps with some type of tactile warning devices. The Dutch concentrate on bicycle facilities and traffic-calming strategies as a whole, rather than pedestrian accommodations. And likewise in Germany, the focus is on implementing areawide traffic calming strategies, not specific pedestrian treatments. Disincentives for motor vehicles, education, and law enforcement are discusssed.
OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A wide variety of practices are used in Great Britain, Germany, and the Netherlands to enhance pedestrian safety and mobility at street crossings. This article examines the suitability of these practices for transfer to the United States. The Federal Highway Administration sponsored a pedestrian and bicycle research scanning trip to the three European countries mentioned above. Great Britain employs mostly curb ramps with some type of tactile warning devices. The Dutch concentrate on bicycle facilities and traffic-calming strategies as a whole, rather than pedestrian accommodations. And likewise in Germany, the focus is on implementing areawide traffic calming strategies, not specific pedestrian treatments. Disincentives for motor vehicles, education, and law enforcement are discusssed.
Key concepts: Pedestrian, Traffic calming, Law enforcement, Transport engineering, Enforcement, Variety (cybernetics), Administration (probate law), Business