1991Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research BoardRequires access

IMAGE OF RAIL TRANSIT

K F Turnbull

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Many aspects of rail transit systems are often classified as intangible--that is, they are perceived as beneficial but are difficult or impossible to quantify. Included in this category are the image that the rail system projects; the system's effect on the city's image, marketing and promotional activities, and land use and development; and the perception of what the rail system has done for the quality of life and mobility of an area. To obtain a better understanding of the impacts that rail transit systems have had on these aspects, the Texas Transportation Institute, under contract to the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (Houston Metro), conducted interviews with representatives of agencies and organizations in four cities that recently implemented rail transit systems: Atlanta, Miami, Portland, and San Diego. Similar interviews were conducted in Houston, allowing a comparison of responses in Houston with those from the other cities. The results, which provide a qualitative, rather than quantitative, assessment of some of the less tangible aspects of rail transit systems, should benefit metropolitan areas where rail transit systems are being considered and practitioners attempting to better understand the rail transit decision-making process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Many aspects of rail transit systems are often classified as intangible--that is, they are perceived as beneficial but are difficult or impossible to quantify. Included in this category are the image that the rail system projects; the system's effect on the city's image, marketing and promotional activities, and land use and development; and the perception of what the rail system has done for the quality of life and mobility of an area. To obtain a better understanding of the impacts that rail transit systems have had on these aspects, the Texas Transportation Institute, under contract to the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (Houston Metro), conducted interviews with representatives of agencies and organizations in four cities that recently implemented rail transit systems: Atlanta, Miami, Portland, and San Diego. Similar interviews were conducted in Houston, allowing a comparison of responses in Houston with those from the other cities. The results, which provide a qualitative, rather than quantitative, assessment of some of the less tangible aspects of rail transit systems, should benefit metropolitan areas where rail transit systems are being considered and practitioners attempting to better understand the rail transit decision-making process.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Many aspects of rail transit systems are often classified as intangible--that is, they are perceived as beneficial but are difficult or impossible to quantify. Included in this category are the image that the rail system projects; the system's effect on the city's image, marketing and promotional activities, and land use and development; and the perception of what the rail system has done for the quality of life and mobility of an area. To obtain a better understanding of the impacts that rail transit systems have had on these aspects, the Texas Transportation Institute, under contract to the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County (Houston Metro), conducted interviews with representatives of agencies and organizations in four cities that recently implemented rail transit systems: Atlanta, Miami, Portland, and San Diego. Similar interviews were conducted in Houston, allowing a comparison of responses in Houston with those from the other cities. The results, which provide a qualitative, rather than quantitative, assessment of some of the less tangible aspects of rail transit systems, should benefit metropolitan areas where rail transit systems are being considered and practitioners attempting to better understand the rail transit decision-making process.

Key concepts: Metropolitan area, Miami, Transport engineering, Atlanta, Transit (satellite), Rail transit, Public transport, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IMAGE OF RAIL TRANSIT — Research Paper | ScholarLens