2008•Transportation Research Board 87th Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

Investigating consistency in transit passenger arrivals: insights from longitudinal AFC data

D Csikos, Graham Currie

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Previous research has established that one category of transit passengers 'target' their arrival at a time shortly before the service is scheduled. Another group of passengers arrive randomly, seemingly unaffected by timetable schedules. The time of day plus transit service characteristics, such as headway and reliability, affect the split of passengers between these groups. Little is known about the longitudinal aspects of the non-random arrival behavior. This paper assesses the day-to-day consistency of transit users' arrival behavior by analysing longitudinal automated fare collection system (AFC) data for heavy rail services in Melbourne, Australia. It makes further distinctions of the transit users that have up until now been categorized into random or non-random arrival behavior. Four archetypal arrival behaviors are derived. Consistency of arrival behavior is quantified and investigated. Heterogeneity is an overriding feature of transit commuters' longitudinal behavior. Transit users exhibiting a greater amount of consistency were found to arrive closer to the transit's timetabled time, used fewer scheduled services and traveled earlier in the peak. A systematic difference in arrival behavior was found for users of a terminus station.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Previous research has established that one category of transit passengers 'target' their arrival at a time shortly before the service is scheduled. Another group of passengers arrive randomly, seemingly unaffected by timetable schedules. The time of day plus transit service characteristics, such as headway and reliability, affect the split of passengers between these groups. Little is known about the longitudinal aspects of the non-random arrival behavior. This paper assesses the day-to-day consistency of transit users' arrival behavior by analysing longitudinal automated fare collection system (AFC) data for heavy rail services in Melbourne, Australia. It makes further distinctions of the transit users that have up until now been categorized into random or non-random arrival behavior. Four archetypal arrival behaviors are derived. Consistency of arrival behavior is quantified and investigated. Heterogeneity is an overriding feature of transit commuters' longitudinal behavior. Transit users exhibiting a greater amount of consistency were found to arrive closer to the transit's timetabled time, used fewer scheduled services and traveled earlier in the peak. A systematic difference in arrival behavior was found for users of a terminus station.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Previous research has established that one category of transit passengers 'target' their arrival at a time shortly before the service is scheduled. Another group of passengers arrive randomly, seemingly unaffected by timetable schedules. The time of day plus transit service characteristics, such as headway and reliability, affect the split of passengers between these groups. Little is known about the longitudinal aspects of the non-random arrival behavior. This paper assesses the day-to-day consistency of transit users' arrival behavior by analysing longitudinal automated fare collection system (AFC) data for heavy rail services in Melbourne, Australia. It makes further distinctions of the transit users that have up until now been categorized into random or non-random arrival behavior. Four archetypal arrival behaviors are derived. Consistency of arrival behavior is quantified and investigated. Heterogeneity is an overriding feature of transit commuters' longitudinal behavior. Transit users exhibiting a greater amount of consistency were found to arrive closer to the transit's timetabled time, used fewer scheduled services and traveled earlier in the peak. A systematic difference in arrival behavior was found for users of a terminus station.

Key concepts: Headway, Consistency (knowledge bases), Transit (satellite), Arrival time, Transport engineering, Computer science, Service (business), Public transport

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Investigating consistency in transit passenger arrivals: insights from longitudinal AFC data — Research Paper | ScholarLens