1992Unpublished venueRequires access

BRACING OF STEEL BEAMS IN BRIDGES. FINAL REPORT

Joseph A. Yura, B. Phillips, S. Raju, Steve Webb

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The report summarizes the research conducted to evaluate the lateral bracing effect of bridge decks. Design requirements for bracing steel beams to control lateral-torsional buckling are developed. Braces are classified as torsional braces (diaphragms, cross frames) or lateral braces (top chord laterals, bridge decks). Analytical studies were conducted which investigated the effect of brace type, size, location, and number of braces on the lateral buckling of beams subject to different loading conditions. Results of tests conducted on twin beams compared favorably with the analytical solution. Both the tests and the theoretical solution showed the cross section distortion had a significant effect on torsional braces. The tests with no bracing or full bracing compared favorably with the new AASHTO lateral buckling formulas. From the tests and the theory, simple formulas for brace force and brace stiffness are presented which are suitable for design and specifications. For lateral bracing, the brace force is 0.8% of the beam force, which includes some provision for beam out-of-straightness. For torsional bracing, the design formulas can be used to determine web stiffener requirements to control cross section distortion. Five design examples illustrate the use of the bracing formulas.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The report summarizes the research conducted to evaluate the lateral bracing effect of bridge decks. Design requirements for bracing steel beams to control lateral-torsional buckling are developed. Braces are classified as torsional braces (diaphragms, cross frames) or lateral braces (top chord laterals, bridge decks). Analytical studies were conducted which investigated the effect of brace type, size, location, and number of braces on the lateral buckling of beams subject to different loading conditions. Results of tests conducted on twin beams compared favorably with the analytical solution. Both the tests and the theoretical solution showed the cross section distortion had a significant effect on torsional braces. The tests with no bracing or full bracing compared favorably with the new AASHTO lateral buckling formulas. From the tests and the theory, simple formulas for brace force and brace stiffness are presented which are suitable for design and specifications. For lateral bracing, the brace force is 0.8% of the beam force, which includes some provision for beam out-of-straightness. For torsional bracing, the design formulas can be used to determine web stiffener requirements to control cross section distortion. Five design examples illustrate the use of the bracing formulas.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The report summarizes the research conducted to evaluate the lateral bracing effect of bridge decks. Design requirements for bracing steel beams to control lateral-torsional buckling are developed. Braces are classified as torsional braces (diaphragms, cross frames) or lateral braces (top chord laterals, bridge decks). Analytical studies were conducted which investigated the effect of brace type, size, location, and number of braces on the lateral buckling of beams subject to different loading conditions. Results of tests conducted on twin beams compared favorably with the analytical solution. Both the tests and the theoretical solution showed the cross section distortion had a significant effect on torsional braces. The tests with no bracing or full bracing compared favorably with the new AASHTO lateral buckling formulas. From the tests and the theory, simple formulas for brace force and brace stiffness are presented which are suitable for design and specifications. For lateral bracing, the brace force is 0.8% of the beam force, which includes some provision for beam out-of-straightness. For torsional bracing, the design formulas can be used to determine web stiffener requirements to control cross section distortion. Five design examples illustrate the use of the bracing formulas.

Key concepts: Bracing, Brace, Structural engineering, Engineering, Chord (peer-to-peer), Stiffness, Buckling, Bridge (graph theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
BRACING OF STEEL BEAMS IN BRIDGES. FINAL REPORT — Research Paper | ScholarLens