2005•Digital Commons - DU (University of Denver)Requires access

The I-70 Mountain Corridor Expansion Project: Does the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 Apply?

Megan A Yahr

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The plans of the Colorado Department of Transportation to widen the I-70 Corridor are discussed in relation to the protective statutes for environment, wildlife and historic resources included in the Department of Transportation Act of 1966. This article first discusses the history and policy behind section 4(f) in the Transportation Act, summarizes the statutory requirements, and reviews case law and interpretations. A list of the protected resources possibly affected by the I-70 construction is provided, and the projected adverse impacts identified by a preliminary study by the Colorado Department of Transportation are discussed. Finally, the article argues that the project qualifies for the standards for protection, as the area can meet the three characteristics of protection: public, significant and used as a park, recreation area, wildlife or waterfowl refuge, or historic property.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The plans of the Colorado Department of Transportation to widen the I-70 Corridor are discussed in relation to the protective statutes for environment, wildlife and historic resources included in the Department of Transportation Act of 1966. This article first discusses the history and policy behind section 4(f) in the Transportation Act, summarizes the statutory requirements, and reviews case law and interpretations. A list of the protected resources possibly affected by the I-70 construction is provided, and the projected adverse impacts identified by a preliminary study by the Colorado Department of Transportation are discussed. Finally, the article argues that the project qualifies for the standards for protection, as the area can meet the three characteristics of protection: public, significant and used as a park, recreation area, wildlife or waterfowl refuge, or historic property.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The plans of the Colorado Department of Transportation to widen the I-70 Corridor are discussed in relation to the protective statutes for environment, wildlife and historic resources included in the Department of Transportation Act of 1966. This article first discusses the history and policy behind section 4(f) in the Transportation Act, summarizes the statutory requirements, and reviews case law and interpretations. A list of the protected resources possibly affected by the I-70 construction is provided, and the projected adverse impacts identified by a preliminary study by the Colorado Department of Transportation are discussed. Finally, the article argues that the project qualifies for the standards for protection, as the area can meet the three characteristics of protection: public, significant and used as a park, recreation area, wildlife or waterfowl refuge, or historic property.

Key concepts: Recreation, Statute, Statutory law, National Environmental Policy Act, Wildlife, Legislative history, Environmental planning, Land use

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The I-70 Mountain Corridor Expansion Project: Does the Department of Transportation Act of 1966 Apply? — Research Paper | ScholarLens