2003bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

Misappropriation: A Dirge

Richard A. Posner

Open full text 9 citations

Abstract

It is pertinent to note that RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPETITION § 38 cmt.b (1995), recommends that there should be no residual common law tort of misappropriation ("residual" because the tort right of publicity, the law of trade secrets, and patent and copyright law, not to mention the tort of conversion, would provide remedies against specific forms of what might loosely be called "misappropriation"). Learned Hand, the leading intellectual property judge of the twentieth century, was famously skeptical about misappropriation doctrine in general and the INS decision in particular.See Cheney Bros. v.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is pertinent to note that RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPETITION § 38 cmt.b (1995), recommends that there should be no residual common law tort of misappropriation ("residual" because the tort right of publicity, the law of trade secrets, and patent and copyright law, not to mention the tort of conversion, would provide remedies against specific forms of what might loosely be called "misappropriation"). Learned Hand, the leading intellectual property judge of the twentieth century, was famously skeptical about misappropriation doctrine in general and the INS decision in particular.See Cheney Bros. v.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is pertinent to note that RESTATEMENT (THIRD) OF UNFAIR COMPETITION § 38 cmt.b (1995), recommends that there should be no residual common law tort of misappropriation ("residual" because the tort right of publicity, the law of trade secrets, and patent and copyright law, not to mention the tort of conversion, would provide remedies against specific forms of what might loosely be called "misappropriation"). Learned Hand, the leading intellectual property judge of the twentieth century, was famously skeptical about misappropriation doctrine in general and the INS decision in particular.See Cheney Bros. v.

Key concepts: Misappropriation, Doctrine, Scope (computer science), Intellectual property, Law and economics, Law, Property (philosophy), Function (biology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Misappropriation: A Dirge — Research Paper | ScholarLens