1967•bepress Legal RepositoryOpen access

New Dimensions to the Privilege against Self-Incrimination: The Supreme Court and the Fifth Amendment

P. Allan Dionisopoulos

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

H ISTORICALLY the Supreme Court of the United States has per- mitted individuals to assert the privilege against self-incrimination only within defined circumstances.The one judicial test is: will the answers incriminate directly or provide a link in the chain of evidence?This test has made it possible for the Court to identify those instances in which the privilege could not be asserted-situations in which there is no real danger that answers will lead to criminal prosecution.'Since the emphasis is on whether a criminal proceeding is a distinct possibility, the Court has decided that the privilege may not be asserted when a statute of limitations bars prosecution, or when the ground for refusing to answer is that the * The author earned a B. A. in 1948, a B.S. in 1950, an M.A. in 1950 at the University of Minnesota and a Ph.D. in 1960 at U.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

H ISTORICALLY the Supreme Court of the United States has per- mitted individuals to assert the privilege against self-incrimination only within defined circumstances.The one judicial test is: will the answers incriminate directly or provide a link in the chain of evidence?This test has made it possible for the Court to identify those instances in which the privilege could not be asserted-situations in which there is no real danger that answers will lead to criminal prosecution.'Since the emphasis is on whether a criminal proceeding is a distinct possibility, the Court has decided that the privilege may not be asserted when a statute of limitations bars prosecution, or when the ground for refusing to answer is that the * The author earned a B. A. in 1948, a B.S. in 1950, an M.A. in 1950 at the University of Minnesota and a Ph.D. in 1960 at U.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

H ISTORICALLY the Supreme Court of the United States has per- mitted individuals to assert the privilege against self-incrimination only within defined circumstances.The one judicial test is: will the answers incriminate directly or provide a link in the chain of evidence?This test has made it possible for the Court to identify those instances in which the privilege could not be asserted-situations in which there is no real danger that answers will lead to criminal prosecution.'Since the emphasis is on whether a criminal proceeding is a distinct possibility, the Court has decided that the privilege may not be asserted when a statute of limitations bars prosecution, or when the ground for refusing to answer is that the * The author earned a B. A. in 1948, a B.S. in 1950, an M.A. in 1950 at the University of Minnesota and a Ph.D. in 1960 at U.

Key concepts: Self-incrimination, Supreme court, Law, Privilege (computing), Amendment, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
New Dimensions to the Privilege against Self-Incrimination: The Supreme Court and the Fifth Amendment — Research Paper | ScholarLens