New Dimensions to the Privilege against Self-Incrimination: The Supreme Court and the Fifth Amendment
P. Allan Dionisopoulos
Abstract
Open-access reader
P. Allan Dionisopoulos
Abstract
Open-access reader
H ISTORICALLY the Supreme Court of the United States has per- mitted individuals to assert the privilege against self-incrimination only within defined circumstances.The one judicial test is: will the answers incriminate directly or provide a link in the chain of evidence?This test has made it possible for the Court to identify those instances in which the privilege could not be asserted-situations in which there is no real danger that answers will lead to criminal prosecution.'Since the emphasis is on whether a criminal proceeding is a distinct possibility, the Court has decided that the privilege may not be asserted when a statute of limitations bars prosecution, or when the ground for refusing to answer is that the * The author earned a B. A. in 1948, a B.S. in 1950, an M.A. in 1950 at the University of Minnesota and a Ph.D. in 1960 at U.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
H ISTORICALLY the Supreme Court of the United States has per- mitted individuals to assert the privilege against self-incrimination only within defined circumstances.The one judicial test is: will the answers incriminate directly or provide a link in the chain of evidence?This test has made it possible for the Court to identify those instances in which the privilege could not be asserted-situations in which there is no real danger that answers will lead to criminal prosecution.'Since the emphasis is on whether a criminal proceeding is a distinct possibility, the Court has decided that the privilege may not be asserted when a statute of limitations bars prosecution, or when the ground for refusing to answer is that the * The author earned a B. A. in 1948, a B.S. in 1950, an M.A. in 1950 at the University of Minnesota and a Ph.D. in 1960 at U.
Key concepts: Self-incrimination, Supreme court, Law, Privilege (computing), Amendment, Political science