1995Unpublished venueRequires access

Performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel in highway bridges

Kenneth C. Clear, Zongjin Li, Jack F. McIntyre, S K Lee

Open publisher page 37 citations

Abstract

Laboratory, test yard and field research studies were performed to evaluate the performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel (ECR) with regard to corrosion protection. The effort consisted of a critical interpretative literature review, consideration of ECR production plant and job site practices and quality control methodologies. The testing program included bars acquired from ten sources and involved coating characterization, 80 deg C aqueous exposure testing, chemical immersion testing (ambient temperature) in various electrolytes and test yard exposure of ECRs in chloride contaminated concrete slabs. Performance was assessed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and coating adhesion testing. Where appropriate, the testing was also performed upon in place ECRs at bridge construction sites. ECR performance in the different tests varied according to bar source, and it was concluded that impedance and solvent extraction weight loss were the coating properties with which long-term corrosion protectiveness best correlated. Coating failure mechanisms were identified as underfilm corrosion in association with either conductive pathways through the coating, wet adhesion loss, cathodic disbondment and corrosion at coating defects (or combinations of these). It was concluded that an unacceptably high percentage of the coatings evaluated would not provide long-term corrosion protection in chloride contaminated concrete transportation service.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Laboratory, test yard and field research studies were performed to evaluate the performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel (ECR) with regard to corrosion protection. The effort consisted of a critical interpretative literature review, consideration of ECR production plant and job site practices and quality control methodologies. The testing program included bars acquired from ten sources and involved coating characterization, 80 deg C aqueous exposure testing, chemical immersion testing (ambient temperature) in various electrolytes and test yard exposure of ECRs in chloride contaminated concrete slabs. Performance was assessed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and coating adhesion testing. Where appropriate, the testing was also performed upon in place ECRs at bridge construction sites. ECR performance in the different tests varied according to bar source, and it was concluded that impedance and solvent extraction weight loss were the coating properties with which long-term corrosion protectiveness best correlated. Coating failure mechanisms were identified as underfilm corrosion in association with either conductive pathways through the coating, wet adhesion loss, cathodic disbondment and corrosion at coating defects (or combinations of these). It was concluded that an unacceptably high percentage of the coatings evaluated would not provide long-term corrosion protection in chloride contaminated concrete transportation service.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 37 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Laboratory, test yard and field research studies were performed to evaluate the performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel (ECR) with regard to corrosion protection. The effort consisted of a critical interpretative literature review, consideration of ECR production plant and job site practices and quality control methodologies. The testing program included bars acquired from ten sources and involved coating characterization, 80 deg C aqueous exposure testing, chemical immersion testing (ambient temperature) in various electrolytes and test yard exposure of ECRs in chloride contaminated concrete slabs. Performance was assessed by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and coating adhesion testing. Where appropriate, the testing was also performed upon in place ECRs at bridge construction sites. ECR performance in the different tests varied according to bar source, and it was concluded that impedance and solvent extraction weight loss were the coating properties with which long-term corrosion protectiveness best correlated. Coating failure mechanisms were identified as underfilm corrosion in association with either conductive pathways through the coating, wet adhesion loss, cathodic disbondment and corrosion at coating defects (or combinations of these). It was concluded that an unacceptably high percentage of the coatings evaluated would not provide long-term corrosion protection in chloride contaminated concrete transportation service.

Key concepts: Corrosion, Coating, Dielectric spectroscopy, Materials science, Epoxy, Cathodic protection, Composite material, Chloride

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel in highway bridges — Research Paper | ScholarLens