1992Unpublished venueRequires access

EXPANSION JOINTS - AN OVERVIEW OF TRL RESEARCH

J R Cunninghame

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Any type of joint is a potential source of weakness. Modern concrete and steel bridges have joints to accommodate the movements of the bridge deck relative to the adjacent pavement. Most of these joints leak, allowing water and chlorides to penetrate deck ends, abutments, piers and crossheads and cause corrosion of the reinforcing steel. The performance of current joints is very variable. Some are satisfactory, but many have service lives of only a few years and are expensive to maintain. Joint performance is determined by a complex combination of factors. Some of the main factors are: the movements at the joint resulting from thermal variations and traffic loading, the installation conditions and standard of workmanship, the choice of materials, and the 'liveliness' of the structure. This paper describes planned TRL research to develop a performance based specification based on approval testing. Laboratory test rigs are used to simulate movements and wheel loading on joints and a range of material tests are assessed for use in quality control. Methods of eliminating joints are also being studied. Continuous spans rather than a series of simply supported spans reduce the number of deck joints. More recently bridges have been designed to be fully integral by building-in to the abutments, eliminating deck joints altogether. The performance of various designs, in the UK and other countries has been studied. (A) For the covering abstract see IRRD 860342.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Any type of joint is a potential source of weakness. Modern concrete and steel bridges have joints to accommodate the movements of the bridge deck relative to the adjacent pavement. Most of these joints leak, allowing water and chlorides to penetrate deck ends, abutments, piers and crossheads and cause corrosion of the reinforcing steel. The performance of current joints is very variable. Some are satisfactory, but many have service lives of only a few years and are expensive to maintain. Joint performance is determined by a complex combination of factors. Some of the main factors are: the movements at the joint resulting from thermal variations and traffic loading, the installation conditions and standard of workmanship, the choice of materials, and the 'liveliness' of the structure. This paper describes planned TRL research to develop a performance based specification based on approval testing. Laboratory test rigs are used to simulate movements and wheel loading on joints and a range of material tests are assessed for use in quality control. Methods of eliminating joints are also being studied. Continuous spans rather than a series of simply supported spans reduce the number of deck joints. More recently bridges have been designed to be fully integral by building-in to the abutments, eliminating deck joints altogether. The performance of various designs, in the UK and other countries has been studied. (A) For the covering abstract see IRRD 860342.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Any type of joint is a potential source of weakness. Modern concrete and steel bridges have joints to accommodate the movements of the bridge deck relative to the adjacent pavement. Most of these joints leak, allowing water and chlorides to penetrate deck ends, abutments, piers and crossheads and cause corrosion of the reinforcing steel. The performance of current joints is very variable. Some are satisfactory, but many have service lives of only a few years and are expensive to maintain. Joint performance is determined by a complex combination of factors. Some of the main factors are: the movements at the joint resulting from thermal variations and traffic loading, the installation conditions and standard of workmanship, the choice of materials, and the 'liveliness' of the structure. This paper describes planned TRL research to develop a performance based specification based on approval testing. Laboratory test rigs are used to simulate movements and wheel loading on joints and a range of material tests are assessed for use in quality control. Methods of eliminating joints are also being studied. Continuous spans rather than a series of simply supported spans reduce the number of deck joints. More recently bridges have been designed to be fully integral by building-in to the abutments, eliminating deck joints altogether. The performance of various designs, in the UK and other countries has been studied. (A) For the covering abstract see IRRD 860342.

Key concepts: Expansion joint, Workmanship, Deck, Joint (building), Structural engineering, Engineering, Bridge deck, Bridge (graph theory)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
EXPANSION JOINTS - AN OVERVIEW OF TRL RESEARCH — Research Paper | ScholarLens