1985•Unpublished venueRequires access

COUNTIES GIVE BUMPY RIDE TO DTP ROUTINE MAINTENANCE CODE

J Gosney

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

An account is given of some of the new guidelines for routine trunk and motorway maintenance that the Department of Transport has introduced. The code of practise marks a new approach to cyclic maintenance on the Department's roads which the counties manage. Instead of cutting grass, cleaning gulleys and sweeping streets at intervals that county surveyors think are sensible and appropriate the code lays down intervals that the Department of Transport deems are appropriate. The DTP code insists on more inspections, the theory being to start with minimum standards and revise them upwards only when inspections establish the need. Some of the criticisms of county surveyors from different parts of the country are reported. These include: the minimum standards are too low; the procedure to get a local variation is bureaucratic; and the new code will lead to a deterioration in safety standards, appearance, and condition of motorways and trunk roads. However in answer to the criticism that it has pitched its standards too low the DTP has pointed out that in the past standards varied greatly from county to county. The new code also requires the county agents to build an inventory of the highway infrastructure in their area. Details are given of the hand held computer and menu driven software the Department will provide for carrying out this inventory collection. (TRRL)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An account is given of some of the new guidelines for routine trunk and motorway maintenance that the Department of Transport has introduced. The code of practise marks a new approach to cyclic maintenance on the Department's roads which the counties manage. Instead of cutting grass, cleaning gulleys and sweeping streets at intervals that county surveyors think are sensible and appropriate the code lays down intervals that the Department of Transport deems are appropriate. The DTP code insists on more inspections, the theory being to start with minimum standards and revise them upwards only when inspections establish the need. Some of the criticisms of county surveyors from different parts of the country are reported. These include: the minimum standards are too low; the procedure to get a local variation is bureaucratic; and the new code will lead to a deterioration in safety standards, appearance, and condition of motorways and trunk roads. However in answer to the criticism that it has pitched its standards too low the DTP has pointed out that in the past standards varied greatly from county to county. The new code also requires the county agents to build an inventory of the highway infrastructure in their area. Details are given of the hand held computer and menu driven software the Department will provide for carrying out this inventory collection. (TRRL)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An account is given of some of the new guidelines for routine trunk and motorway maintenance that the Department of Transport has introduced. The code of practise marks a new approach to cyclic maintenance on the Department's roads which the counties manage. Instead of cutting grass, cleaning gulleys and sweeping streets at intervals that county surveyors think are sensible and appropriate the code lays down intervals that the Department of Transport deems are appropriate. The DTP code insists on more inspections, the theory being to start with minimum standards and revise them upwards only when inspections establish the need. Some of the criticisms of county surveyors from different parts of the country are reported. These include: the minimum standards are too low; the procedure to get a local variation is bureaucratic; and the new code will lead to a deterioration in safety standards, appearance, and condition of motorways and trunk roads. However in answer to the criticism that it has pitched its standards too low the DTP has pointed out that in the past standards varied greatly from county to county. The new code also requires the county agents to build an inventory of the highway infrastructure in their area. Details are given of the hand held computer and menu driven software the Department will provide for carrying out this inventory collection. (TRRL)

Key concepts: Code (set theory), Transport engineering, Bureaucracy, Business, Computer science, Engineering, Operations management, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COUNTIES GIVE BUMPY RIDE TO DTP ROUTINE MAINTENANCE CODE — Research Paper | ScholarLens