1988•Unpublished venueRequires access

AUTO-AUTO AND AUTO-BICYCLE INTERACTIONS IN PRIORITY SITUATIONS --ROAD USER BEHAVIOR. THEORY AND RESEARCH. PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROAD SAFETY HELD IN GRONINGEN, NETHERLANDS, AUGUST 1987

W H Janssen, Ara Van Der Horst, Piet Bakker, W Ten Broeke

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

No established body of knowledge exists which deals with the effects of priority rules and regulations on road user behaviour. Amongst the municipal authorities in the Netherlands two distinct attitudes are prevalent regarding the introduction of priority regulations at intersections in their jurisdiction. One view is that priority regulations should be looked upon with suspicion because they invite traffic on the main road to turn that road into a racing circuit. The other attitude considers priority regulations as one of the more potent means to increase safety on intersections, because they regulate the manner traffic participants have to handle encounters that could become critical. The evidence that can help decide what attitude is correct is scarce, and it stems exclusively from before and after studies. What is needed for the evaluation of priority rules and regulations is knowledge of what goes on in people's minds when they have an encounter that could develop into a conflict (or worse), and what behaviour they display as a consequence. The present study was performed to obtain data that could provide such knowledge concerning at least a number of relevant situations.(a) for the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD 815404.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

No established body of knowledge exists which deals with the effects of priority rules and regulations on road user behaviour. Amongst the municipal authorities in the Netherlands two distinct attitudes are prevalent regarding the introduction of priority regulations at intersections in their jurisdiction. One view is that priority regulations should be looked upon with suspicion because they invite traffic on the main road to turn that road into a racing circuit. The other attitude considers priority regulations as one of the more potent means to increase safety on intersections, because they regulate the manner traffic participants have to handle encounters that could become critical. The evidence that can help decide what attitude is correct is scarce, and it stems exclusively from before and after studies. What is needed for the evaluation of priority rules and regulations is knowledge of what goes on in people's minds when they have an encounter that could develop into a conflict (or worse), and what behaviour they display as a consequence. The present study was performed to obtain data that could provide such knowledge concerning at least a number of relevant situations.(a) for the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD 815404.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

No established body of knowledge exists which deals with the effects of priority rules and regulations on road user behaviour. Amongst the municipal authorities in the Netherlands two distinct attitudes are prevalent regarding the introduction of priority regulations at intersections in their jurisdiction. One view is that priority regulations should be looked upon with suspicion because they invite traffic on the main road to turn that road into a racing circuit. The other attitude considers priority regulations as one of the more potent means to increase safety on intersections, because they regulate the manner traffic participants have to handle encounters that could become critical. The evidence that can help decide what attitude is correct is scarce, and it stems exclusively from before and after studies. What is needed for the evaluation of priority rules and regulations is knowledge of what goes on in people's minds when they have an encounter that could develop into a conflict (or worse), and what behaviour they display as a consequence. The present study was performed to obtain data that could provide such knowledge concerning at least a number of relevant situations.(a) for the covering abstract of the conference see IRRD 815404.

Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Transport engineering, Road traffic, Computer security, Operations research, Computer science, Public relations, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
AUTO-AUTO AND AUTO-BICYCLE INTERACTIONS IN PRIORITY SITUATIONS --ROAD USER BEHAVIOR. THEORY AND RESEARCH. PAPERS PRESENTED AT THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROAD SAFETY HELD IN GRONINGEN, NETHERLANDS, AUGUST 1987 — Research Paper | ScholarLens