A FIELD EVALUATION OF NUCLEAR GAUGE CALIBRATION METHODS, PART 1: MANUFACTURER'S CALIBRATION
G W Jameson
Abstract
G W Jameson
Abstract
A field evaluation was made of several methods of calibrating nuclear density/moisture gauges. Wet densities, moisture contents and dry densities of a layer of crushed rock pavement were determined by four gauges at 40 sites using the manufacturer's blocks calibration. Subsequently the corresponding orthodox test values were measured by the sand replacement and IPCAD tests. In part 1 of this two part series, the accuracy of results obtained by the manufacturer's blocks method of calibration is discussed. It is concluded that the use of this type of calibration can result in substantially biased estimates of orthodox wet densities, moisture contents and dry densities. Significant differences were also observed between the results of gauges when calibrated by this method. Consequently when specifications are based on gauge rather than orthodox test values, more reproducible results would be obtained if all gauges involved in testing were adjusted to give similar results (a). (TRRL)
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A field evaluation was made of several methods of calibrating nuclear density/moisture gauges. Wet densities, moisture contents and dry densities of a layer of crushed rock pavement were determined by four gauges at 40 sites using the manufacturer's blocks calibration. Subsequently the corresponding orthodox test values were measured by the sand replacement and IPCAD tests. In part 1 of this two part series, the accuracy of results obtained by the manufacturer's blocks method of calibration is discussed. It is concluded that the use of this type of calibration can result in substantially biased estimates of orthodox wet densities, moisture contents and dry densities. Significant differences were also observed between the results of gauges when calibrated by this method. Consequently when specifications are based on gauge rather than orthodox test values, more reproducible results would be obtained if all gauges involved in testing were adjusted to give similar results (a). (TRRL)
Key concepts: Calibration, Gauge (firearms), Moisture, Environmental science, Water content, Field (mathematics), Geotechnical engineering, Soil science