2002•Unpublished venueRequires access

Guidelines for community input in setting level of service and intervention standards for road networks

Rachel Grove, Florin‐Constantin Mihai, Paul Robert Appleby, Mike Bishop, K Eckeroth, P. Shepherd

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This report contains guidelines describing a typical community consultation process, and its application to the asset management task of defining suitable levels of service and target or intervention standards for configuration, condition, and performance of an existing road network.These guidelines are based on the premise that community consultation is fundamental to successful road asset management.The community consultation process described in this report has five distinct phases, from initial planning to implementation and review of the outcomes.The guidelines are intended to form a basis for a road agency to ascertain the expectations of local communities for a road network. The guidelines contain two questionnaires used in recent community surveys in Australia and New Zealand.To define suitable levels of service and target standards, stakeholders express their requirements of the network. Stakeholder requirements for each road category are then translated into engineering terms to produce a framework by which road-related assets can be managed.Community consultation provides opportunities for stakeholders to accept different levels of service for different roads, where it is not economically feasible or necessary to maintain the entire road network to the same standards. It is therefore appropriate to divide the road network into a hierarchy of road categories.The guidelines include a glossary of the specific terminology used.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This report contains guidelines describing a typical community consultation process, and its application to the asset management task of defining suitable levels of service and target or intervention standards for configuration, condition, and performance of an existing road network.These guidelines are based on the premise that community consultation is fundamental to successful road asset management.The community consultation process described in this report has five distinct phases, from initial planning to implementation and review of the outcomes.The guidelines are intended to form a basis for a road agency to ascertain the expectations of local communities for a road network. The guidelines contain two questionnaires used in recent community surveys in Australia and New Zealand.To define suitable levels of service and target standards, stakeholders express their requirements of the network. Stakeholder requirements for each road category are then translated into engineering terms to produce a framework by which road-related assets can be managed.Community consultation provides opportunities for stakeholders to accept different levels of service for different roads, where it is not economically feasible or necessary to maintain the entire road network to the same standards. It is therefore appropriate to divide the road network into a hierarchy of road categories.The guidelines include a glossary of the specific terminology used.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This report contains guidelines describing a typical community consultation process, and its application to the asset management task of defining suitable levels of service and target or intervention standards for configuration, condition, and performance of an existing road network.These guidelines are based on the premise that community consultation is fundamental to successful road asset management.The community consultation process described in this report has five distinct phases, from initial planning to implementation and review of the outcomes.The guidelines are intended to form a basis for a road agency to ascertain the expectations of local communities for a road network. The guidelines contain two questionnaires used in recent community surveys in Australia and New Zealand.To define suitable levels of service and target standards, stakeholders express their requirements of the network. Stakeholder requirements for each road category are then translated into engineering terms to produce a framework by which road-related assets can be managed.Community consultation provides opportunities for stakeholders to accept different levels of service for different roads, where it is not economically feasible or necessary to maintain the entire road network to the same standards. It is therefore appropriate to divide the road network into a hierarchy of road categories.The guidelines include a glossary of the specific terminology used.

Key concepts: Terminology, Service (business), Stakeholder, Process (computing), Glossary, Process management, Business, Intervention (counseling)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Guidelines for community input in setting level of service and intervention standards for road networks — Research Paper | ScholarLens