2014•Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual MeetingTransportation Research BoardRequires access

The Complex Web of Senior Mobility Services

Rosaria M Berliner, Erica Swansen, Michael Knödler, Steven Tupper, Deanna Peabody, John S. Collura

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Mobility, in the strictest sense meaning a person’s ability to travel, is often accompanied by many obvious benefits; when mobility is lost and viable alternatives are unavailable, those benefits are also lost. Senior mobility is of particular concern due to the potential consequences of their lost mobility. If older drivers are no longer able to drive, what is the statewide or regional structure by which their mobility can be maintained? Central to this research is the determination of the existing structure for providing mobility to non-driving seniors in Massachusetts. To this end, this research included the administration of a nationwide survey aimed at developing an understanding of the existing structure in other states. The targeted audience included individuals and groups who have direct knowledge of their jurisdiction’s older driver mobility options. The respondents representing 39 states provided an array of knowledge in the various aspects of senior mobility. Generally, there seemed to be an overall lack of cohesion by which older driver mobility was provided. A simplified model of the general Massachusetts’ mobility structure and a more complex model of its programs were developed in an effort to better understand the statewide mobility system structure for non-driving seniors. A major conclusion is that in the future, an evaluation system should be established both statewide and locally in order to provide seniors and other community members with the information they need to make informed decisions regarding their available mobility options.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mobility, in the strictest sense meaning a person’s ability to travel, is often accompanied by many obvious benefits; when mobility is lost and viable alternatives are unavailable, those benefits are also lost. Senior mobility is of particular concern due to the potential consequences of their lost mobility. If older drivers are no longer able to drive, what is the statewide or regional structure by which their mobility can be maintained? Central to this research is the determination of the existing structure for providing mobility to non-driving seniors in Massachusetts. To this end, this research included the administration of a nationwide survey aimed at developing an understanding of the existing structure in other states. The targeted audience included individuals and groups who have direct knowledge of their jurisdiction’s older driver mobility options. The respondents representing 39 states provided an array of knowledge in the various aspects of senior mobility. Generally, there seemed to be an overall lack of cohesion by which older driver mobility was provided. A simplified model of the general Massachusetts’ mobility structure and a more complex model of its programs were developed in an effort to better understand the statewide mobility system structure for non-driving seniors. A major conclusion is that in the future, an evaluation system should be established both statewide and locally in order to provide seniors and other community members with the information they need to make informed decisions regarding their available mobility options.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mobility, in the strictest sense meaning a person’s ability to travel, is often accompanied by many obvious benefits; when mobility is lost and viable alternatives are unavailable, those benefits are also lost. Senior mobility is of particular concern due to the potential consequences of their lost mobility. If older drivers are no longer able to drive, what is the statewide or regional structure by which their mobility can be maintained? Central to this research is the determination of the existing structure for providing mobility to non-driving seniors in Massachusetts. To this end, this research included the administration of a nationwide survey aimed at developing an understanding of the existing structure in other states. The targeted audience included individuals and groups who have direct knowledge of their jurisdiction’s older driver mobility options. The respondents representing 39 states provided an array of knowledge in the various aspects of senior mobility. Generally, there seemed to be an overall lack of cohesion by which older driver mobility was provided. A simplified model of the general Massachusetts’ mobility structure and a more complex model of its programs were developed in an effort to better understand the statewide mobility system structure for non-driving seniors. A major conclusion is that in the future, an evaluation system should be established both statewide and locally in order to provide seniors and other community members with the information they need to make informed decisions regarding their available mobility options.

Key concepts: Jurisdiction, Cohesion (chemistry), Order (exchange), Business, Political science, Organic chemistry, Finance, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Complex Web of Senior Mobility Services — Research Paper | ScholarLens