2002Unpublished venueRequires access

ALTERNATIVES TO CONGESTION CHARGING FOR CENTRAL LONDON

Cynthia Powell

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This paper outlines the reasons for Westminster City Council's objections to the London Mayor's proposals for congestion charging in central London. It goes on to set out an alternative strategy, which consists of a combination of measures designed to tackle the three objectives of reducing central area congestion, improving air quality and raising money for further investment in transport facilities. Regardless of whether congestion charging is introduced there is a consensus that public transport needs to be improved. In the short term this can only be achieved through improved bus services, but in the longer term significant improvements are needed to rail services, including improving the existing networks and introducing new facilities such as Cross Rail, CrossRail2 (formerly the Chelsea - Hackney line), the London Tram and other similar facilities. Further key alternative measures that the City Council wishes to see are improved compliance with parking regulations, more action against moving traffic offences, more control over the activities of the utilities, a range of further demand management measures and the introduction of further measures to improve air quality. (A) For the covering abstract see ITRD E114895.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper outlines the reasons for Westminster City Council's objections to the London Mayor's proposals for congestion charging in central London. It goes on to set out an alternative strategy, which consists of a combination of measures designed to tackle the three objectives of reducing central area congestion, improving air quality and raising money for further investment in transport facilities. Regardless of whether congestion charging is introduced there is a consensus that public transport needs to be improved. In the short term this can only be achieved through improved bus services, but in the longer term significant improvements are needed to rail services, including improving the existing networks and introducing new facilities such as Cross Rail, CrossRail2 (formerly the Chelsea - Hackney line), the London Tram and other similar facilities. Further key alternative measures that the City Council wishes to see are improved compliance with parking regulations, more action against moving traffic offences, more control over the activities of the utilities, a range of further demand management measures and the introduction of further measures to improve air quality. (A) For the covering abstract see ITRD E114895.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper outlines the reasons for Westminster City Council's objections to the London Mayor's proposals for congestion charging in central London. It goes on to set out an alternative strategy, which consists of a combination of measures designed to tackle the three objectives of reducing central area congestion, improving air quality and raising money for further investment in transport facilities. Regardless of whether congestion charging is introduced there is a consensus that public transport needs to be improved. In the short term this can only be achieved through improved bus services, but in the longer term significant improvements are needed to rail services, including improving the existing networks and introducing new facilities such as Cross Rail, CrossRail2 (formerly the Chelsea - Hackney line), the London Tram and other similar facilities. Further key alternative measures that the City Council wishes to see are improved compliance with parking regulations, more action against moving traffic offences, more control over the activities of the utilities, a range of further demand management measures and the introduction of further measures to improve air quality. (A) For the covering abstract see ITRD E114895.

Key concepts: Traffic congestion, Transport engineering, Public transport, Congestion pricing, Control (management), Quality (philosophy), Investment (military), Bus priority

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ALTERNATIVES TO CONGESTION CHARGING FOR CENTRAL LONDON — Research Paper | ScholarLens